Hi,
On 18.09.23 19:38, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I'm not sure how that works because you'd need to respawn yourself
with systemd-inhibit, whereas the API essentially gives you a file
descriptor over dbus that you keep open until it is safe to reboot.
popen("systemd-inhibit ... cat",
Hi,
On 18.09.23 19:38, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I'm not sure how that works because you'd need to respawn yourself
with systemd-inhibit, whereas the API essentially gives you a file
descriptor over dbus that you keep open until it is safe to reboot.
popen("systemd-inhibit ... cat",
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> While dpkg on systems using systemd _could_ by default take an
> system inhibitor lock, and could provide a good enough reason like say
> "Packaging system upgrade" or whatever, my concern has been with the
> added dependency chain,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> While dpkg on systems using systemd _could_ by default take an
> system inhibitor lock, and could provide a good enough reason like say
> "Packaging system upgrade" or whatever, my concern has been with the
> added dependency chain,
[ CCing #910377 for some context. ]
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:59:47 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> > The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to
> > system operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For
> > example, a reboot during a background
[ CCing #910377 for some context. ]
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:59:47 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> > The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to
> > system operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For
> > example, a reboot during a background
Hello,
The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to system
operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For example, a
reboot during a background package upgrade process on critical system packages
unbeknownst to the user may result in the system
ure the display manager to be a system-critical package, but a server
distribution might not.
- Peter Warrington
From: "Weatherby,Gerard"
Date: Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 20:45
To: Peter Warrington , "debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org"
Subject: Re: System-critical package
The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to system
operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For example, a
reboot during a background package upgrade process on critical system packages
unbeknownst to the user may result in the system unable to boot
9 matches
Mail list logo
