Hi!
[ Just rereading my reply, I should stop sending mail with a sleep deprived
brain, sorry! :) ]
On Fri, 2019-06-28 at 08:09:11 -0400, Crim, Christopher wrote:
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 9:09:34 PM EDT Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:58:34 -0400, Crim, Christopher wrote:
>
Thank you Guillem for your response. I have a few followups that I have put
inline below.
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 9:09:34 PM EDT Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:58:34 -0400, Crim, Christopher wrote:
> > I am trying to understand the regex rules in the function split_s
Guillem Jover writes:
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:58:34 -0400, Crim, Christopher wrote:
>> I have tried searching for inforamtion related to to naming conventions
>> for shared library names but the best I can come up with is that they
>> need to be prefixed with "lib" and suffixed with ".so" and
Hi!
On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:58:34 -0400, Crim, Christopher wrote:
> I am trying to understand the regex rules in the function split_soname from
> dkpg-shlibdeps.pl. Working with an old corporate code base that has yet to
> adopt any versioning, all of the shared objects are named .so. When
>
I am trying to understand the regex rules in the function split_soname from
dkpg-shlibdeps.pl. Working with an old corporate code base that has yet to
adopt any versioning, all of the shared objects are named .so. When
attempting to package on a box that does not yet have the dependent package
5 matches
Mail list logo