sean finney writes ("dpkg and sqlite redux"):
> something like sqlite would give the benefit of not only a smarter way
> of storing the data but also it would lower the complexity of the
> datastructures needed to work with the data, since much of the overhead
> could be
* sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070414 00:37]:
> - i'm not advocating sqlite necessarily, but some db library. and not even
> some db library as much as a smarter way of storing information to begin
> with,
> though some db's do provide advantages (query syntaxes, etc)
> - i'm also suggest
hi folks,
sorry for breaking the thread, but i'm not subscribed and i wasn't cc'd,
and my current MUA sucks.
> from ian:
> Well, I don't know if I still count as one of the `dpkg team' but I
> think this is a terrible idea for lots of reasons. dpkg needs to be
> very reliable; its databases mus
3 matches
Mail list logo
