Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.19-1.dazh
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
There are some alternatives with no choices and
update-alternatives --all asks about them though skipping alternatives
with the only choice. There is a one-line patch for this problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.19
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Patch attached. alternatively, it could just be aone line shell script
that runs
date --rfc-822
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:17:16PM -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> (moving the discussion over to a bug that acutally isn't fixed by
> my patch.)
I see that a few bugs were unmerged. I guess that you want to separate
the cases related to conffiles and those related to configuration files.
I bel
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 00:12:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
(moving the discussion over to a bug that acutally isn't fixed by
my patch.)
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:04PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> I have read and tested your patch of Fri, 12 May 2006 22:38:56 -0500. I
> confirm that it fixes the problem for defoma/ttf-bitstream-vera and that
> it does
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> clone 354999 -1
Bug#354999: dpkg: s-s-d documentation wrongly implies that --name only is
disallowed
Bug 354999 cloned as bug 367608.
> retitle -1 [S-S-D] Make the dangers of certai
6 matches
Mail list logo