Hi there lovcely,
This kind of opportunity comes ones in a life. I dobn't want
to miss it. Do you? I am coming to your cplace in few days
and Ia though cmay be we can meet each other. If you don't mind
I can send you my picturea. I am a girl.
aYou can correscpond with me usibng my email [EMAIL PR
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Reinstalling coreutils (5.94-1) fixes the glitch.
>
> Do you know which versions of coreutils and dpkg you had installed
> before the upgrade? Do you have the full upgrade log available?
Hint: /var/backups/dpkg.status.* may contain info on what was
previously installe
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.19
Error messages:
...
Hit ftp://ftp.gwdg.de testing/contrib Sources
Fetched 2B in 5s (0B/s)
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
Command executed as
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:27:30PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> At this point I have no idea how a system could get into this state.
> Could someone run some upgrades to try to duplicate? (I can't.)
I'm pretty sure I tested all upgrade paths from sarge to sid when
removing that diversions stuff
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:44:46PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> dpkg: xserver-xorg: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
> x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg.
> Removing xserver-xorg ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xorg.prerm: line 909: md5sum: command not found
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 374386 dselect
Bug#374386: wajig: typo in update
Bug reassigned from package `wajig' to `dselect'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
At this point I have no idea how a system could get into this state.
Could someone run some upgrades to try to duplicate? (I can't.)
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:53:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342465: French man dpkg is truncated at --set-selections
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: dpkg,coreutils
Version: 1.13.21
Severity: serious
dpkg: xserver-xorg: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg.
Removing xserver-xorg ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xorg.prerm: line 909: md5sum: command not found
Unpacking xse
Presumably you just experienced
#362671: apt-listbugs:
bad control file parsing; sends the long description to dpkg --compare-versions
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:24:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing as wontfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Frank Lichtenheld writes ("Re: Bug#349442: dpkg dependtry assertion is due to
broken cycle breaking"):
> I guess that shows two things:
> 1) I really shouldn't do patches for the dependency handling code in
> dpkg
Well, it shows that you should be more cautious about whether you
understand i
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:20:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Do not ignore me pblease,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I am coming to your place in few weeksb and thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To U
14 matches
Mail list logo
