On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:28:05PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
>> Running debian-rules can always have side effects and can actively
>> rely on them so a "--has-target" can not be implemented cleanly in
>> make.
>
> I am proposing hooking into the logic that ultimately decides that
> there is no su
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:11:04PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> One of the issue is that tools like sbuild and pbuilder which want to
> take advantage of the Build-Depends-Indep split needs to know whether
> dpkg-buildpackage will call debian/rules build or build-arch.
It needs to know no such t
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:01:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > So, an idea: what about checking "make -f /dev/null blah 2>/dev/null" first,
> > for some portability?
>
> What 'blah' are you planning to use that's guaranteed to n
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 06:07:54PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep
> targets for lenny?"):
> > Attached is a patch to dpkg which implements a check for a 'build-arch'
> > target using 'make -f debian/rules -qn build-arch'.
> Why
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So, an idea: what about checking "make -f /dev/null blah 2>/dev/null" first,
> > for some portability?
>
> What 'blah' are you planning to use that's guaranteed to not have broken
> side-effects in some cases on Debian packages?
How about: "blah
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.25
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps
Hi,
it seems that dpkg-shlibdeps is somewhat out of sync with glibc/binutils in
regards to the ld.so.conf syntax. There are two things wrong:
1. # Support system library directories.
my $ldconfigdir = '/lib/
Simon Richter writes ("Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets
for lenny?"):
> The entire issue circles around not being able to reliably detect
> whether the target is present using a simple script. But who said it has
> to be a script?
We want the package to _declare_ whether
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets
for lenny?"):
> Attached is a patch to dpkg which implements a check for a 'build-arch'
> target using 'make -f debian/rules -qn build-arch'.
Why are we so resistant to the new debian/control field ? That
doesn't req
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:26:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I believe the attached patch has the following characteristics:
> > - Behavior on systems where 'make' is not GNU make is undefined.
> > Specifically, on such a sys
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:26:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I believe the attached patch has the following characteristics:
> - Behavior on systems where 'make' is not GNU make is undefined.
> Specifically, on such a system dpkg is likely to either conclude that
> /all/ packages support '
10 matches
Mail list logo
