Bug#379418: dpkg-buildpackage: signing .dsc and .changes fails with UTF-8 encoded uid

2007-07-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 02:46:26PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: > Lintian (and Policy?) requires the Debian changelog to be UTF-8 > encoded. But if -- for example, -- the maintainer name is encoded this > way, then gpg fails to find the secret key because assumes by default > that the command li

Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:22:28PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:08:02AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > dpkg-dev. On the other hand the current maintainer scripts handle > > upgrade issues for even more ancient versions. So I'm a bit reluctant > > Forgive my ignor

Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:08:02AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > dpkg-dev. On the other hand the current maintainer scripts handle > upgrade issues for even more ancient versions. So I'm a bit reluctant Forgive my ignorance, but are you saying that dpkg-dev comes with maintainer scripts? [f

Processed: Re: Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 430463 wishlist Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' > tag 430463 - moreinfo unreproducible Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible T

Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
severity 430463 wishlist tag 430463 - moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Since nobody so far seems to have encountered the same problem I'm > > inclined to close th

Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Since nobody so far seems to have encountered the same problem I'm > inclined to close the bug report. If you still think there is really As Raphaël pointed out, dpkg-dev probably contained a real directory eons ago (I'm sure I m

Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty

2007-07-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.14.4 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 12.5 > > dpkg-dev only comes with an empty /usr/share/doc subdir, without any > changelog or copyright. Was this meant to be a symlink to dpkg? Hi.

Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

2007-07-10 Thread Ian Jackson
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?"): > Lo?c Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why not promote these to requirements in a particular policy version > > instead? I fear we will have to list 10 Build-Options in all packages > > in a couple of years.