On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:18:14AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> You're right, this seems to be rather confusing. I think what it's
> trying to say is if abort-remove fails, set to Failed-Config, else keep
> the (Installed) state. It should probably also keep the other states.
>
> You could als
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:21:11PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:27:27PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > > package dpkg
> > > tags 432893 + patch
> > > kthxbye
> > >
> > > Attached is a patch that *sh
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:27:27PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > package dpkg
> > tags 432893 + patch
> > kthxbye
> >
> > Attached is a patch that *should* fix this bug. It simply restores the
> > previous state of a package when
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> package dpkg
> tags 432893 + patch
> kthxbye
>
> Attached is a patch that *should* fix this bug. It simply restores the
> previous state of a package when a removal fails, instead of simply
> setting it to installed. Preliminary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package dpkg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dpkg
> tags 432893 + patch
Bug#432893: dpkg: Failed install followed by failed remove results in installed
state
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
package dpkg
tags 432893 + patch
kthxbye
Attached is a patch that *should* fix this bug. It simply restores the
previous state of a package when a removal fails, instead of simply
setting it to installed. Preliminary testing seems to confirm that this
works. A changelog entry is also included.
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This showed up in #438551, and we fixed it by prepending LC_ALL=C to our
>> call to u-a, but it would be nice if there was an interface to query
>> update-alternative's status with respect to a particular alternative.
>> Something which doesn't change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> forcemerge 323911 440956
Bug#323911: dpkg-dev: [manual] dpkg-buildpackage: Please clarify -i option
explanation
Bug#440956: dpkg: dpkg-source [manual] Clarify text of options -i
Forc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 441958 dpkg
Bug#441958: locales: 'EOF on stdin at conffile prompt' on noninteractive update
Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `dpkg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> We had to fix some older alternatives breakage from a package we took
> over, and used update-alternatives --display to see whether we needed to
> do anything. Unfortunately,
>
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] update-alternatives --display xdvi.bin
> xdvi.bin
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I don't see why I should not change the severity of a report against a
> package I'm not maintaining if the severity looks incorrect and the
> maintainance team didn't state anything about the severity. If you were
> basing that on something, plea
11 matches
Mail list logo
