Your message dated Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452621: fixed in dpkg 1.14.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452318: fixed in dpkg 1.14.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452577: fixed in dpkg 1.14.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.7
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages
The man page says that the override file in invocation of
dpkg-scanpackages is optional. However, dpkg-scanpackages fails if the
file is not specified.
workaround: specify /dev/null as the override file
-- Syste
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Somehow I was thinking I had implemented a cache but I must have mixed up
> with something else. Thanks for the check!
No problem.
> I did my best to make it understandable compared to the old code. :)
Well done.
> Applied. But it doesn't give a hu
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps's latest incarnation (as of 1.14.8 and its experimental
> predecessors) introduces a performance regression: it runs dpkg
> --search once per executable or library being examined, rather than
> caching its results any fashion. As each call
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
> tags 452577 + pending
Bug#452577: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps no longer optimizes dpkg --search usa
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
dpkg-shlibdeps's latest incarnation (as of 1.14.8 and its experimental
predecessors) introduces a performance regression: it runs dpkg
--search once per executable or library being examined, rather than
caching its results any fashion.
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.10
Followup-For: Bug #452338
Looks like to me that it's still occurring with version 1.14.10, on
iceweasel:
# dh_shlibdeps -p iceweasel -l debian/iceweasel/usr/lib/iceweasel
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library name
`libxpcom_core.so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
> tags 452318 + pending
Bug#452318: dpkg-dev: new dpkg-shlibdeps spews insane amount of warnings
T
Raphael, since you say that Jarno's current patch applies fine to the
current version of dpkg, would it be possible for you to merge it?
While waiting for somebody to implement a three way merge, I'd much
prefer a two way merge (Jarno's patch) to nothing (which is what we
have now).
Please merge
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:40:39PM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I'd rather be more strict and relax the rules as we identify cases where I
> have been too strict, than let people upload broken .debs during weeks and
> later discover that we have to scan the full archive to rebuild
> a bunch of
[ CCing #452511 as I provide an explanation of why we shouldn't change
back to --ignore-missing-info by default without careful consideration ]
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Damn I wanted to answer to that, and forgot: I don't think anyone
> wants a revert. I'd expect you to make
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
The recent change to check missing shlibdeps files and to error out if
not makes some packages insta-buggy where they otherwise wouldn't be. A
good example is in libm; there is no shlibdeps file for libm, which
makes dpkg-shlibd
14 matches
Mail list logo
