Bug#220044: marked as done (update-alternatives does not restore (lost) link for slave files in target location)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220044: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#377400: marked as done (dpkg - -genchanges support for more than one arch in debian/files)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377400: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#433567: marked as done (emacs: alternatives problem)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#76295: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#76295: marked as done ([U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#246906: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#455520: marked as done (dpkg-dev: sort before in dependencies)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#455520: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#451872: marked as done (emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#451872: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#453885: marked as done (dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64))

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453885: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#76295: marked as done ([U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#76295: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#441021: marked as done (dpkg: update-alternatives breaks config on uninstall)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#441021: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#377400: marked as done (dpkg - -genchanges support for more than one arch in debian/files)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#356299: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#76295: marked as done ([U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433567: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#451872: marked as done (emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433567: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#457739: marked as done (/usr/bin/dpkg-gensymbols: dpkg-gensymbols doesn't grok #DEPRECATED ...# versions properly)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#457739: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#451872: marked as done (emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#76295: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#109794: marked as done (Support building only architecture-independant packages)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#109794: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#451872: marked as done (emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#246906: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#220044: marked as done (update-alternatives does not restore (lost) link for slave files in target location)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#392440: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#433567: marked as done (emacs: alternatives problem)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#246906: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#373003: marked as done (dpkg-dev: deb-control.5 old rule for Version hyphenation)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#373003: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#109794: marked as done (Support building only architecture-independant packages)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#200454: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#76295: marked as done ([U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#451872: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#246906: marked as done (/usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#246906: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#433567: marked as done (emacs: alternatives problem)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433567: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#246906: marked as done (/usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433567: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#457673: marked as done (dpkg: man/Makefile.am should respect the nls configure flag)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#457673: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#454616: marked as done (dpkg-dev: g++ links -lm by default, and dpkg-shlibdeps complains)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#454616: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#200454: marked as done (Support building only architecture-independant packages)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#109794: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#229143: marked as done ([DPKG-GENCHANGES] cannot handle packages with same name but different types)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#229143: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#453364: marked as done (dpkg-source: Vcs-Cvs not recognized when field value starts with colon)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453364: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356299: marked as done (dpkg-genchanges: Allow for multiple archs in debian/files)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377400: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356299: marked as done (dpkg-genchanges: Allow for multiple archs in debian/files)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#356299: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#455260: marked as done (dpkg-gensymbols: symbol files cannot be shared across packages)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#455260: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#457833: marked as done (dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64.)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453885: fixed in dpkg 1.14.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#452730: Not fixed in dpkg-dev 1.14.13

found 452730 1.14.13 thanks Hi, something went wrong with this upload. The necessary {dpkg-dev,dselect}.preinst scripts are missing from the binary and source packages, so the symlinks in /usr/share/doc are still there after the upgrade. Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: tagging 452730

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 tags 452730 + pending Bug#452730: changelogs out of sync There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#457962: marked as done (dpkg_1.14.13(m68k/unstable): Missing dependency on IO/String.pm)

at 20071227-1331 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.81), libbz2-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libselinux1-dev (= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], pkg-config, po4a (= 0.23), zlib1g-dev (= 1:1.1.3-19.1) [...] DIED

Bug#457962: dpkg_1.14.13(m68k/unstable): Missing dependency on IO/String.pm

Package: dpkg Version: 1.14.13 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of dpkg_1.14.13 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 85 Build started at 20071227-1331 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.81

Bug#183470: Just Read What Our Satisfied Customers Say!

100% Money Back Guarantee. http://neptiunuei.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#457964: please add common symbols for armel

Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.13 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Seen in multiple build logs: grep __exidx * gpsd_2.35-3_20071226-1052:+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.35-3 gpsd_2.35-3_20071226-1052:+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.35-3 gpsd_2.35-3_20071226-1052:+ [EMAIL

Bug#457962: closed by Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#457962: dpkg_1.14.13(m68k/unstable): Missing dependency on IO/String.pm)

On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:27:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Yep, this was already known and is the reason of the quick 1.14.14 upload.. Oops -- sorry. -- Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processed: setting package to dpkg dpkg-dev dselect, tagging 457964

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg tags 457964 + pending Bug#457964: please add common symbols for armel Tags were: patch Tags added:

Bug#457964: please add common symbols for armel

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Riku Voipio wrote: __exidx_end and __exidx_start are arm eabi internal symbols from libgcc. I suggest blacklisting them in SymbolFile.pm: Thanks I added those symbols to the blacklist. Will be in dpkg-dev 1.14.15. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à

Bug#262596: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:16:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #262596, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) . (NB: If you are a system

Bug#139569: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:16:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #139569, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) . (NB: If you are a system

Bug#157305: You will be suprised

Great Gift ideas online Top Quality for Men, Women and Kids http://synewperiod.net Beyond ice floe and berg and ice-bound sea, VIII. Russia: The Great Northern Expedition How can they get the point of how a world -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#108587: Nice gift ideas

Great Gift ideas online Top Quality for Men, Women and Kids http://synewperiod.com their bellies, they're out cold, instantaneously He terrifies the Vast, he seems so wild; Wind, sleet. The branches sway, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.