Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # dpkg (1.14.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix dpkg-genchanges to detect udeb based on Package-Type control
> #header instead of file extension analysis on uploaded
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# dpkg (1.14.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix dpkg-genchanges to detect udeb based on Package-Type control
#header instead of file extension analysis on uploaded files.
#Closes: #476113
#
package dselect dpkg-dev
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:29:58 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Determining a file's type from its extension is "weak and specific"?
I'd say generally, yes. But it also depends on the type of file.
> > Tell that to /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.p*.
Those are
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> This doesn't stike me as a goods change to have made if you want to get
> the current version of dpkg into testing for the release.
And what do you want us to do? Revert the change?
See the discussion at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/03/msg003
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.18
Severity: normal
dpkg-buildpackage exporting CFLAGS can cause packages to FTBFS. See for
example #475979. In this case the package consists of a top-level
makefile, that runs a makefile in a subdirectory. The toplevel makefile
sets CFLAGS to some value, but does
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:12:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#475935: dpkg-source man page not updated for new
formats
has caused the Debian Bug report #475935,
regarding dpkg-source man page not updated for new formats
to be marked as done.
This
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> In the past, the source.changes file apparently did not contain a
> Descriptions field, but that has now been added.
Indeed. Funnily dropping them completely created problems and changing it
in the other (more logical) direction also creates problems...
>
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.18
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
A change in the way the source.changes files are generated is causing a
regression since previous versions when the source.changes file is merged
with an .changes file for packages that have udebs.
In the past, the source.changes fi
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:06:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#475650: dpkg: support multiple sets of build-depends
and multiple build passes
has caused the Debian Bug report #475650,
regarding dpkg: support multiple sets of build-depends and multi
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 19:32 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm tending to think this request should be just closed, will wait few
> > more days for more input from you or other members of the team, though.
>
> I agree with this statement. (I wondered
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Ari Pollak wrote:
> There appears to be new information in the dpkg-source man page as
> documented here: http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/dpkg-source.html
> but the dpkg-source manpage included with dpkg doesn't seem to include
> the new information, like information about ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
