Processed: setting package to dselect dpkg-dev dpkg, tagging 149961, tagging 485365, tagging 102144 ...

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 > # via tagpending > # > # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Add '.hgignore' to the default dpkg-source -i regex and -I pattern. > #Closes: #485365 > # * Support di

Bug#149961: setting package to dselect dpkg-dev dpkg, tagging 149961, tagging 485365, tagging 102144 ...

2008-06-18 Thread Guillem Jover
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 # via tagpending # # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Add '.hgignore' to the default dpkg-source -i regex and -I pattern. #Closes: #485365 # * Support diverting files when origin and destination are on different

Bug#486937: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS must be whitespace-separated

2008-06-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.20 Severity: serious Tags: patch Policy 3.8.0.1, section 4.9.1, on DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS: If multiple flags are given, they must be separated by whitespace. dpkg-buildpackage uses "," separators instead, which breaks any rules file that follows the example code in

Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends:

2008-06-18 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Hertzog said: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I'm talking about ordering of maintainer scripts in an install run. > > This I understood, but maintainer script are mostly used for simple > tasks and for starting/stopping services. Thus I was askin

Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends:

2008-06-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote: > I'm talking about ordering of maintainer scripts in an install run. This I understood, but maintainer script are mostly used for simple tasks and for starting/stopping services. Thus I was asking you if the case where you want to order the configuration o

Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends:

2008-06-18 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Hertzog said: > severity 483997 wishlist > thanks > > On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Right now, if you have two packages that have a relationship with each > > other beyond a strict Dependency, there is no way to communicate that > > relationship

Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends:

2008-06-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
severity 483997 wishlist thanks On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote: > Right now, if you have two packages that have a relationship with each > other beyond a strict Dependency, there is no way to communicate that > relationship to dpkg. I'm talking about things covered semantically > by the

Processed: Re: Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends:

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 483997 wishlist Bug#483997: dpkg: please allow for a mechanism to specify postinst ordering beyond Depends: Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#486323: marked as done (dpkg-dev: Does not handle all comments in quilt series files)

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#486323: fixed in dpkg 1.14.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #486323, regarding dpkg-dev: Does not handle all comments in quilt series files to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#469033: marked as done (dpkg-divert --remove can't be used to remove an erroneous diversion)

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#469033: fixed in dpkg 1.14.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #469033, regarding dpkg-divert --remove can't be used to remove an erroneous diversion to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#476973: marked as done (dpkg-divert: Can't divert files in not (yet) existing directories)

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#476973: fixed in dpkg 1.14.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #476973, regarding dpkg-divert: Can't divert files in not (yet) existing directories to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#383448: marked as done (Catalan translation review)

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383448: fixed in dpkg 1.14.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #383448, regarding Catalan translation review to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#484002: marked as done (dpkg: imperfect package description)

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#484002: fixed in dpkg 1.14.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #484002, regarding dpkg: imperfect package description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be