On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> connect(11, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in
> progress)
>
Please try to remove libnss-ldap
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: serious
/usr/share/dpkg/archtable is missing armel. This should be fixed for
lenny.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What would a "PhD" title do for your resume?
Special accredited university program for working adults
Call 24/7 on
For US: 1-419-735-9250
Outside US: +1-419-735-9250
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add new option --require-valid-signature to dpkg-source. Closes: #390282
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 390282 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 375711 - patch
Bug#375711: Inconsistent formatting in a few files
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> # via tagpending
> #
> # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add new option --require-valid-signature to dpkg-source. Closes: #390282
> #
> package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Unpacking dpkg and then configuring it did the trick.
>
> Did you free some disk space in between and were the triggers for man-db
> processed again?
Yes, the first thing I did was clearing apt's cache to try again. And
IIRC,
On 2008-06-23 11:38 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> As discussed with buxy on IRC, today I tried an upgrade, when my disk
> filled up during trigger execution for package "dpkg". After this, I was
> unable to configure dpkg.
>
> S'està preparant per a reemplaçar dpkg 1.14.19 (fent servir
> .../dpkg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> # via tagpending
> #
> # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add new option --listpackage to dpkg-divert. Thanks to Timothy G Abbott
> #<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the p
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add new option --listpackage to dpkg-divert. Thanks to Timothy G Abbott
#<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the patch. Closes: #485012
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
ta
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> > Do you have the problem with other packages as well ?
>
> With any package. I suppose it is the problem with dpkg itself.
Weird. Did you try to "strace" dpkg to see what makes him so busy ?
"strace -p " to trace an already running process.
Did you c
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: normal
Hi,
After aptitude install multipath-tools, the freshly started daemon
holds on the aptitude-dpkg communication pipe:
# ls -l /proc/$(pgrep multipathd)/fd
total 9
lr-x-- 1 root root 64 2008-06-23 17:12 0 -> /dev/null
l-wx-- 1 root root 64 2
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> Should I provide some extra information, etc?
Yes you should it's not clear what goes wrong on your machine and
nobody else had such a problem.
Can you provide a log of the upgrade session ?
What does /var/log/dpkg.log show from you long upgrade
On Monday 23 June 2008 21:19:13 you wrote:
> Well, I meant to reassign this to dpkg so that it would be in front of
> people who can actually help you, but it looks like I messed up (didn't
> actually Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Let me try again.
>
> Daniel
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Oleg A
El 23/06/08 09:45 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> El 23/06/08 02:37 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > > > I don't know if we want to put both in the same module or if we need
> > > > to come up with a different name (or a sub-module maybe).
> > >
> > > I can try doing this, although I couldn't find an appro
Sie sind die meiste Zeit erreichebar und haben allerhand Zeit??
Sie moechten Ihre Zeit fuer Ihre Geldboerse aufbrauchen?
Bitte bei uns an [EMAIL PROTECTED] kurz melden, die Details kommen
unverzueglich.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > As such, it probably makes sense to add support for both in the same
> > module but with different commands to allow checking one set or the other
> > or both.
>
> I'm not really sure this is a good idea. The way I see it, Build-Options is
> most use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> package aptitude
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: aptitude
> reassign 486044 dpkg
Bug#486044: [aptitude] Unpacking of upgradeable packages is very(!) slow
Bug reassigned from package
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
>> $ dpkg --configure -a
>> Setting up xulrunner-1.9 (1.9~b5-4) ...
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xulrunner-1.9.postinst: line 12: 4477 Segmentation fault
>> ./regxpcom
>> dpkg: error processing xu
El 23/06/08 02:37 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > > I don't know if we want to put both in the same module or if we need to
> > > come up with a different name (or a sub-module maybe).
> >
> > I can try doing this, although I couldn't find an appropriate name
> > (perhaps Source::BuildOptions?). The
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: important
As discussed with buxy on IRC, today I tried an upgrade, when my disk
filled up during trigger execution for package "dpkg". After this, I was
unable to configure dpkg.
S'està preparant per a reemplaçar dpkg 1.14.19 (fent servir
.../dpkg_1.14.20
21 matches
Mail list logo
