On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:40:53PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The option --oknodo changes the behaviour to the LSB recomendations but
many services in Debian don't use this option and return 1 in the case
I've quotted. This is very problematic for me when I try to use a Debian
service
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Reply-To:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
Bug#426877: dpkg: Option --oknodo should be the default behaviour
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
retitle 426877 Clarify what sensible behaviour is for init scripts
thanks
Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
reassign 489238 dpkg-dev 1.14.20
Bug#489238: Cryptic message when using | in Conflicts
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-dev'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I accidentally used a | in conflicts (instead of depends) in a build
and this resulter in:
dpkg-gencontrol: internal error: The method merge_union() is only valid for
Dpkg::Deps::Simple
As discussed on IRC with Raphaël, this is a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Apply patch from Ian Jackson to correctly handle packages in status
#triggers-awaited while trying to sort
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Use description of installed package as fallback in dselect.
#Based on a patch from Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Closes: #21659
#
package dselect dpkg-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Use description of installed package as fallback in dselect.
#Based on a patch from Bruce Sass [EMAIL
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Sergei Ivanov wrote:
Could you drop me a note on whether the feature is worth considering
for inclusion to dpkg, at some point in the future? (I don't know,
maybe I'm the only one who finds fakeroot inconvenient.)
At first sight, it looks reasonable. I updated your patch
Hi Carlo,
sorry for the delay in getting back to you but dpkg has many open bugs...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Carlo Contavalli wrote:
I'm a DD too, and if there is any chance for it to be included
in the ``upstream'' dpkg, I'd be willing to work on writing
documentation, verify it works under
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Timothy G Abbott wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
While I realize that using dpkg-divert on conffiles is an uncommon
practice, the current behavior is clearly wrong.
I've attached a simple git patch against
11 matches
Mail list logo
