Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 555824 dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it
Bug #555824 [dpkg] cupt: Wrong use of --force-depends --force-conflicts
Changed Bug title to 'dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it' from
'cupt: Wrong use of --force-depends
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 555824 dpkg
Bug #555824 [cupt] cupt: Wrong use of --force-depends --force-conflicts
Bug reassigned from package 'cupt' to 'dpkg'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On 2009-11-11 22:46 +0100, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello.
I had next packages installed on my system: perl-base, perl,
perl-modules, perl-doc (all from current unstable, 5.10.1-7).
-8-
sudo
Sven Joachim wrote:
This is because your perl 5.10.1-8 package both Replaces and Conflicts
with the installed version of perl-modules. In such a case, dpkg
removes the offending package, assuming that the to-be-installed
conflicting one supersedes it (because of the Replaces). Note that dpkg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 555824 normal
Bug #555824 [dpkg] dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Could you upload your packages somewhere? I would like to reproduce the
problem.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sven Joachim wrote:
Could you upload your packages somewhere? I would like to reproduce the
problem.
Yes, see http://people.debian.org/~jackyf/perl-candidates/.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:02:34 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
reassign 555824 dpkg
thanks
Firstly, this has nothing to do with cupt, I did the command manually.
Where did you see 'cupt' in the report?
As you have reported similar reports in the past, I went and checked
cupt sources and it
Guillem Jover wrote:
As you have reported similar reports in the past, I went and checked
cupt sources and it seems to be passing those flags to dpkg (which is
wrong
No, it just necessary for plenty of upgrade actions. And I see no reason why
passing these options is wrong, nor in the manual,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 554912 tspc
Bug #554912 [dpkg] dpkg: remove doesn't work for broken/not working packages
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'tspc'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.14.25.
retitle 554912 tspc: Fails to remove due to
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 15:35:43 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:35:39 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.3.1
I debugged a failure in ubuntu today where the package update-motd
was updated to a new version that contained no files (that was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 537338 pending
Bug #537338 [dpkg] new --force option unexpected --configure problems
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 537338 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #537338 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=85b9b00
---
commit 85b9b00518419b23c209bb6567566b99f004241f
13 matches
Mail list logo
