On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Objections or seconds?
Looks mostly good except:
> @@ -8014,6 +7998,34 @@ ln -fs ../sbin/sendmail debian/tmp/usr/bin/runq
> and which manages the shared configuration files. (The
> sgml-base package is a good example.)
>
> +
Your message dated Sat, 21 Aug 2010 06:26:20 +0200
with message-id <20100821042620.ga7...@gaara.hadrons.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#593201: [S-S-D] Do not kill processes outside of a
chroot when using --exec
has caused the Debian Bug report #593201,
regarding [S-S-D] Do not kill processes outsid
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> What happens if you have a package on the system that's removed but not
>> purged and you install another package (conflicting with the first)
>> that contains the same conffile? I suspect the conffile will be
>> treated as lo
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> I moved the debian folder of an otherwise workign package into a separate
> directory
> and then symlinked to it. This is helpful as a preparation for
> svn-buildpackage
> with propset mergeWithUpstream 1 debian .
Where was the target directory?
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.8.4
Severity: minor
Hello,
I moved the debian folder of an otherwise workign package into a separate
directory
and then symlinked to it. This is helpful as a preparation for svn-buildpackage
with propset mergeWithUpstream 1 debian .
dpkg-source was not happy, whi
5 matches
Mail list logo