Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:38:24AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > Well, I've written DPKG::Log because I had a need for it and thought
> > it could be useful for others. Merging it into the dpkg codebase is
> > probably a good idea a
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 604397 + normative discussion
quit
(please consider dropping policy Bug#604397 or dpkg-buildpackage Bug#229357
from replies)
Hi,
Roger Leigh wrote:
[out of order for convenience]
> Just for the record, I've implemented support in debhelper's dh
> c
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:20:15AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Colin Watson wrote:
> > We're considering bringing up a ppc64 port of the Ubuntu server, and it
> > appears to be best to build it with -O3 rather than -O2. (I realise
> > that this would be unusual in Debian a
Hi,
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Well, I've written DPKG::Log because I had a need for it and thought
> it could be useful for others. Merging it into the dpkg codebase is
> probably a good idea and so I'm revisiting that idea with this mail.
> I see one problem, however.
> My
[.. Resending the mail as it seemingly did not reach the list and BTS ..]
Hi dpkg maintainers,
in a reply to my blog post about DPKG::Log, Raphael Hertzog, commented:
> I would suggest you to submit Dpkg::Log to dpkg
> itself... to be included in libdpkg-perl.
>
> I wonder why you did not ask in
tag 612472 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #612472 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=e02f4f5
---
commit e02f4f5bba696d270b3b82158794f5859a09f507
Aut
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 612472 pending
Bug #612472 [dpkg] dpkg: Ubuntu ppc64 optimisation defaults
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
612472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612472
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're considering bringing up a ppc64 port of the Ubuntu server, and it
> appears to be best to build it with -O3 rather than -O2. (I realise
> that this would be unusual in Debian and that there are more obstacles
> to this than just dpkg-buildf
8 matches
Mail list logo