Processed (with 4 errors): Bug still happening, even with recent kernels

2011-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 595927 Bug #595927 {Done: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org} [dpkg] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: task dpkg blocked for more than 120 seconds Bug #600075 {Done: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org} [dpkg] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Problem

Processed: Bug still happening, even with recent kernels

2011-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 595927 Bug #595927 {Done: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org} [dpkg] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: task dpkg blocked for more than 120 seconds Bug #600075 {Done: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org} [dpkg] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Problem

Bug#627412: dpkg: dpkg --install should not unpack package if dependencies are missing

2011-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.0.3 Severity: wishlist While it is formally correct for dpkg to unpack the package on --install when the dependencies are missing, doing so creates a problem if users try to install a low-level package with missing dependencies (remember the APT Pre-Depends thread). I

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.8.10 Severity: wishlist As it was discovered in some places (#558151), some system modifications cannot be sanely made without specifying --auto-deconfigure to dpkg. Please provide a --deconfigure command, so dpkg front-ends can plan and request deconfigurations

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Eugene, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: As it was discovered in some places (#558151), some system modifications cannot be sanely made without specifying --auto-deconfigure to dpkg. Please provide a --deconfigure command, so dpkg front-ends can plan and request deconfigurations themselves. I

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: On 2011-05-20 13:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote: unpack libc6 unpack libc-bin configure libc-bin configure libc6 Emm, the whole #558151 was about the order above does not work unless you specify --force-bad-path which Guillem was much against.

Bug#627452: dpkg: please provide --deconfigure command

2011-05-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, A quick note to finish the tangent. Jonathan Nieder wrote: In an ideal world, the upgrade path would be unpack libc-bin unpack libc6 configure libc-bin configure libc6 with no deconfigure step (essential packages are not supposed to ever need to be

Bug#627462: dpkg-dev: add .hgsigs to $diff_ignore_default_regexp

2011-05-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.16.0.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch .hgsigs contains changeset signatures from Mercurial gpg extension[0]. Please add it to $diff_ignore_default_regexp. [0] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FileFormats#A.hgsigs_.28ascii.29_.5Bgpg.5D -- Jakub Wilk diff --git

Bug#627462: dpkg-dev: add .hgsigs to $diff_ignore_default_regexp

2011-05-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 21:29:22 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.16.0.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch .hgsigs contains changeset signatures from Mercurial gpg extension[0]. Please add it to $diff_ignore_default_regexp. I've merged a version that modifies