Hello,
On sekmadienis 24 Liepa 2011 22:42:10 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > What do you think about using a negative dependency template id in order
> > to trigger dpkg-shlibdeps failure? In my opinion, it's still useful (for
> > reference purpos
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> What do you think about using a negative dependency template id in order to
> trigger dpkg-shlibdeps failure? In my opinion, it's still useful (for
> reference purposes) to have version information even for private symbols.
Could be workable I
Hello,
On pirmadienis 13 Birželis 2011 11:03:19 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Since private symbols are not to be used outside of the source package,
> we can just invent a special value to use in the associated minimal
> version field.
> symbol@Base *private*
>
> If that's not ok, then the easiest
3 matches
Mail list logo
