Processed: Bug#631494 marked as pending

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 631494 pending Bug #631494 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -S fails to clean up temporary files on SIGINT Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631494:

Bug#631494: marked as pending

2011-08-02 Thread Raphaƫl Hertzog
tag 631494 pending thanks Hello, Bug #631494 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=7c2df89 --- commit 7c2df89844617b70883ab76b1c239a2f088cc232

Processed: severity of 630472 is wishlist

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 630472 wishlist Bug #630472 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: Please add Distribution to .dsc generated by dpkg-source -b Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: reassign 626684 to dpkg-dev, forcibly merging 626684 624652

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 626684 dpkg-dev 1.16.0.3 Bug #626684 [libdpkg-perl] libdpkg-perl: Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in sprintf at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/ErrorHandling.pm line 48. Bug reassigned from package 'libdpkg-perl' to 'dpkg-dev'. Bug No longer

Bug#65699: dpkg-buildpackage should support hooks, logging, environment sanitizing and possibly more

2011-08-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: Concerning environment sanitizing, CONFIG_SITE may be unset. hth, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#489771: Enabling hardening build flags

2011-08-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ Bcc: debian-dpkg to get a wider audience ] Hello, during Debconf I discussed with doko and a few of the tech-ctte members to find a good solution for the problem of enabling hardening build flags. Following that discussion I worked on a few dpkg-buildflags enhancement that are now in the

Processed: tagging 229357

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 229357 - pending Bug #229357 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-buildpackage: support for Build-Options: build-arch Bug #398625 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B: should call build-arch target Bug #479556 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-buildpackage does not call

Bug#636352: dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture

2011-08-02 Thread Michal Suchanek
Package: dpkg Version: 1.16.0.3 Severity: normal Since libraries are allowed to install in /lib/$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) and it is necessary to pick libnss_dns.so.* from there to have DNS lookup working in initramfs dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev (and hence build-essintials) is

Bug#636352: marked as done (dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture)

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:27:17 +0200 with message-id 20110802152717.gb24...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com and subject line Re: Bug#636352: dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture has caused the Debian Bug report #636352, regarding dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch

Processed: Re: Bug#636352: dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture

2011-08-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 636352 Bug #636352 {Done: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org} [dpkg] dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture severity 636352 wishlist Bug #636352 [dpkg] dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture Severity set to

Bug#636352: dpkg: no option to deretmine multiarch architecture

2011-08-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Tue, 02 Aug 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote: Also you can have libraries for *both* subarchs and there is no way to tell on what arch you are actually running, /etc/ld.so.conf will surely include both. Sorry I have been a bit quick to close the report. But it's