On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:58:07PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Niko Tyni wrote:
Looks like dpkg tries to sync /usr/bin/perl5.12.4.dpkg-new when a hard
link has already been renamed to /usr/bin/perl and presumably gotten
executed by someone else.
Does this help?
+ * Open extracted
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 12:11:53 +0100, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.6
Severity: wishlist
Given that Debian packages are not all built with the same helper in
debian/rules, it's difficult to hook something in the build process of all
packages. debuild offers hooks
Hi!
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:33:22 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:58:07PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Niko Tyni wrote:
Looks like dpkg tries to sync /usr/bin/perl5.12.4.dpkg-new when a hard
link has already been renamed to /usr/bin/perl and presumably gotten
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Niko Tyni wrote:
However, are sync_file_range() and fsync() effective with an O_RDONLY
file descriptor? From fsync(2):
EBADF fd is not a valid file descriptor open for writing.
but https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29972 suggests this is
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
In addition such an interface cannot be expected to be used realiably
by maintainers for all builds of their packages on buildds and
similar or user systems, as it needs an additional setup step.
It's definitely not meant for maintainers... but it
Niko Tyni wrote:
From fsync(2):
EBADF fd is not a valid file descriptor open for writing.
*digs* Looks like that description was added between man-pages-1.10
(16-Jan-1996) and man-pages-1.11 (15-Apr-1996). From a look at Linux
0.99.10, I think fsync has just looked at the dirent and
Guillem Jover wrote:
This is misleading on Linux, but it's not a safe portable assumption
to make on POSIX in general as that behaviour is not specified and as
such is implementation specific, some Unix systems do actually fail
on read-only file descriptors, for example:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.8.11
Severity: important
(SID)ametzler@argenau:/tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls-2.12.7$ grep sipsak debian/control
Breaks: sipsak (= 0.9.6-2.1), sipsak (= 0.9.6-2.2)
(SID)ametzler@argenau:/tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls-2.12.7$ dpkg-gencontrol \
-plibgnutls26
Guillem Jover wrote:
This is misleading on Linux, but it's not a safe portable assumption
to make on POSIX in general as that behaviour is not specified and as
such is implementation specific
Ok, here's a patch with better behavior. On Linux and similar platforms,
it just opens the file for
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
To fix that, we should fsync() each file with multiple hard links only
once and then rename all links, so the logic to skip fsync would be no
longer needed.
... and here's a patch on top implementing that.
---
debian/changelog | 13 ++---
src/archives.c |
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
This is misleading on Linux, but it's not a safe portable assumption
to make on POSIX in general as that behaviour is not specified and as
such is implementation specific, some Unix systems do actually fail
on read-only file descriptors, for example:
tag 635683 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ok, here's a patch with better behavior. On Linux and similar platforms,
it just opens the file for reading. If fsync fails with errno == EBADF,
it falls back to opening for writing, and if that fails with errno ==
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 635683 + patch
Bug #635683 [dpkg] dpkg --unpack: »/usr/bin/perl5.12.4.dpkg-new« cannot be
opened: The program cannot be executed or altered/changed (busy)
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 637564 pending
Bug #637564 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: dpkg-gencontrol simplification of Breaks is
broken, simply keeps first found version
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tag 637564 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #637564 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=5c1da3f
---
commit 5c1da3f8c2806490f9a7bed32c0a5b3a24d06d55
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Instead of making yet another exception for hardlinks, it's time
to decide that deferred rename is the norm and only directories
should be exempted from this.
Makes perfect sense. Thanks!
Here's the remainder of the train of thought I sent before. I
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 21:10:20 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
This is misleading on Linux, but it's not a safe portable assumption
to make on POSIX in general as that behaviour is not specified and as
such is implementation specific, some Unix
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 635683 pending
Bug #635683 [dpkg] dpkg --unpack: »/usr/bin/perl5.12.4.dpkg-new« cannot be
opened: The program cannot be executed or altered/changed (busy)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #635683 to the same tags previously set
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 635683 pending
Bug #635683 [dpkg] dpkg --unpack: »/usr/bin/perl5.12.4.dpkg-new« cannot be
opened: The program cannot be executed or altered/changed (busy)
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
tag 635683 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #635683 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=efcf279
---
commit efcf279a50aba3369b24d062017d581006d47d9b
tag 635683 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #635683 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=3fe96e3
---
commit 3fe96e302867a6e983c1c469a2751dfc050ecb1f
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 22:09:55 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
--- a/src/archives.c
+++ b/src/archives.c
@@ -851,7 +851,8 @@ tarobject(void *ctx, struct tar_entry *ti)
* in .dpkg-new.
*/
- if (ti-type == tar_filetype_file ||
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 14:35:58 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
In addition such an interface cannot be expected to be used realiably
by maintainers for all builds of their packages on buildds and
similar or user systems, as it needs an additional
23 matches
Mail list logo
