Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 654453 pending
Bug #654453 [dpkg-dev] deb-control(5) manpage says that Multi-Arch should not
be used for arch:all packages
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
654453:
Package: dpkg
The implementation of vsnprintf in the compat library uses and caches the file
descriptor for a temporary file.
If the vsnprintf function is called before a fork, two concurrent processes
will share the cached file descriptor and will eventually cause a race
condition where the
found 655411 dpkg/1.16.1.2
# doesn't affect Debian architectures
severity 655411 wishlist
quit
Hi,
dan...@ruoso.com wrote:
The implementation of vsnprintf in the compat library uses and
caches the file descriptor for a temporary file.
If the vsnprintf function is called before a fork, two
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 655411 dpkg/1.16.1.2
Bug #655411 [dpkg] Compat vsnprintf implementation subject to race condition
Bug Marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.1.2.
# doesn't affect Debian architectures
severity 655411 wishlist
Bug #655411 [dpkg] Compat
[Just forwarding to the correct bug. :)]
---BeginMessage---
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com escreveu:
Yeah, that's true. Maybe it would be worth dropping the
!HAVE_VSNPRINTF fallback altogether, or we could use one of the many
implementations of vsnprintf available under GPL-compatible
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 655411 dpkg/1.2.0
Bug #655411 [dpkg] Compat vsnprintf implementation subject to race condition
The source dpkg and version 1.2.0 do not appear to match any binary packages
Bug Marked as found in versions dpkg/1.2.0.
thanks
Stopping
found 655411 dpkg/1.2.0
thanks
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 16:40:00 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
dan...@ruoso.com wrote:
The implementation of vsnprintf in the compat library uses and
caches the file descriptor for a temporary file.
If the vsnprintf function is called before a fork, two
Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm committing a fix, that still uses a cached file per process.
Thanks, that makes sense. Sorry, I should think more before throwing
things out like that atfork suggestion.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
8 matches
Mail list logo