Bug#661538: Patch generalization and field to mark staged packages

2012-06-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, P. J. McDermott wrote: > And the subroutines in Dpkg::Control::Fields that get values from > %FIELDS can call the following new subroutine to do so: > > sub field_get($) { > my ($field) = @_; > foreach my $key (keys %FIELDS) { > return $FIELDS{$

Processed: Re: Bug#677139: gcc-4.6: unresolved symbol __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1@GCC_3.5

2012-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 677139 libgcc1 Bug #677139 [dpkg-dev] gcc-4.6: unresolved symbol __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1@GCC_3.5 Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg-dev' to 'libgcc1'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677139 to the same values previously se

Bug#677139: gcc-4.6: unresolved symbol __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1@GCC_3.5

2012-06-12 Thread Guillem Jover
reassign 677139 libgcc1 retitle 677139 libgcc1: Missing entries in symbols file on EABI arches thanks Sorry, it seems I misremembered the issue here! On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 07:06:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:16:51 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > > Package: gcc-4.6 > >

Processed: my old msu.edu email addresses are disappearing

2012-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Update to a permanent email address. > submitter 18612 b...@cs.stanford.edu Bug #18612 [emacsen-common] emacsen-common: no way to install info pages Changed Bug submitter to 'b...@cs.stanford.edu' from 'pfaff...@pilot.msu.edu' > submitter 18204

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#677139: gcc-4.6: unresolved symbol __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1@GCC_3.5

2012-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 677139 dpkg-dev Bug #677139 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: unresolved symbol __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1@GCC_3.5 Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.6' to 'dpkg-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.6/4.6.2-6. Ignoring request to alter fixed ve

Bug#661538: Patch generalization and field to mark staged packages

2012-06-12 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2012-06-08 23:49, P. J. McDermott wrote: > Then could you (or anyone else) suggest a way to handle "Build-Depends- > StageN" and "Build-Depends-Indep-StageN" fields for any values of "N"? > Any clues in this direction would be appreciated. I'll look further > through the code tomorrow to see if

Processed: Bug#652970 marked as pending

2012-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 652970 pending Bug #652970 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-source should clean up after failing to apply a patch Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#671711: Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group] Bug#671711: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'

2012-06-12 Thread Iain Lane
Hi there, [ dropping -devel ] On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:09:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > […] > Hmmm, so I had prepared a patch which basically checks if the package > has its dependencies fulfilled before calling the postinst script with > "triggered", and otherwise defers the trigger