Hi Guillem,
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:01:03 +0200, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:30:19 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
This is an old bug. But at the debconf multiple people thought it has
been fixed already, while I don't think it was.
One small difference is
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Kitt wrote:
[...]
I've added tests to deactivate stack protector and relro on Windows,
Good. Thanks much for that.
and more
controversially I've added x86 and x64 entries in cputable.
I think that's a
Hi Jonathan,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:57:04 -0700, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Stephen Kitt wrote:
[...]
I've added tests to deactivate stack protector and relro on Windows,
Good. Thanks much for that.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
All things considered the simplest way forward is to drop the cputable patch;
^just
(and do nothing more)
at least that way, we'll know that the packages that do build are
On 11 August 2012 15:57, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
controversially I've added x86 and x64 entries in cputable.
I think that's a no-go, sorry. The problem is that after that change
there is no longer one unambiguous Debian arch for each GNU triplet,
which breaks
ditto. this
block 684625 by 681289
# difficult
severity 684625 wishlist
quit
Hi Nelson,
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libqtcore4_4%3a4.8.2-2+b1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libqtcore4/changelog.Debian.gz',
which is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 684625 by 681289
Bug #684625 [dpkg] dpkg: Broken upgrade with multiarch and binNMU
684625 was not blocked by any bugs.
684625 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 684625: 681289
# difficult
severity 684625 wishlist
Bug
7 matches
Mail list logo
