Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:48:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#746331: fixed in dpkg 1.17.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #746331,
regarding Testsuite results ignored during build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:48:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#746306: fixed in dpkg 1.17.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #746306,
regarding dpkg: CVE-2014-0471 fix introduces the vulnerability into squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 746331 pending
Bug #746331 [dpkg] Testsuite results ignored during build
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746331
De
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 746354 pending
Bug #746354 [dpkg] uses xz in cron without recommending/depending on it
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 746306 pending
Bug #746306 [dpkg] dpkg: CVE-2014-0471 fix introduces the vulnerability into
squeeze
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 746350 pending
Bug #746350 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: Translation of dpkg scripts messages templates
to French
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746350: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 00:12:56 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guillem Jover , 2014-04-29, 23:40:
> >>>1. Simply revert the patch, and ignore issues w/ partial upgrades (at
> >>>least for now?).
> >>>2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the
> >>>working patch package. This
* Guillem Jover , 2014-04-29, 23:40:
1. Simply revert the patch, and ignore issues w/ partial upgrades (at
least for now?).
2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the
working patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests,
though.
3. Fix the patch to take into ac
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 18:55:35 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guillem Jover , 2014-04-29, 08:11:
> >1. Simply revert the patch, and ignore issues w/ partial upgrades (at
> >least for now?).
> >2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
> >patch package. This might require
* Guillem Jover , 2014-04-29, 08:11:
1. Simply revert the patch, and ignore issues w/ partial upgrades (at
least for now?).
2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests, though.
3. Fix the patch to take into acc
On 2014-04-29 12:27 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On 29 April 2014 08:11, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [...]
>> 2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
>> patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests, though.
>> 3. Fix the patch to take into acco
Hi,
On 29 April 2014 08:11, Guillem Jover wrote:
[...]
> 2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
> patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests, though.
> 3. Fix the patch to take into account the old behaviour, by checking
> if either of
12 matches
Mail list logo
