Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Bug#852822: signing buildinfo by default breaks
compatibility"):
> I actually realized this while I was waking up today, and brought it
> up on IRC. My biggest concern was the buildd network, because that
> is explicitly not signing files from inside the chroots. But due
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Bug#852820: Testsuite-Restrictions field is hard to
use"):
> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:58:28 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If not interpreted very carefully, this would give a test suite runner
> > the erroneous impression that none of the tests can be run.
>
> Right, I
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Bug#852821: Dropping Built-For-Profiles is risky"):
> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:58:30 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This significantly reduces the amount of information available to
> > understand why a .deb might be the way it is. It also inhibits the
> > ability of the
On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 05:47:44 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:58:28 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm sorry that I'm reporting this bug now, due to happening to see the
> > message on debian-dpkg. But really I think:
> >
> > * Changes to the .dsc format and hence to the S
4 matches
Mail list logo
