Hi,
Am 08.04.2017 um 05:05 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 16:31:27 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
To me there seems to be some confusion which package should document the
information which I have requested in this bug report. In have no strong
preferences whatsoever but it sh
Hi!
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:23:49 +, CONSUEGRA Lenny - externe wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.17.27
> Severity: minor
> Tags: upstream
> When building a package with dpkg-source, warnings are printed if gcc is
> not installed on the system :
>
> root@build:/srv/build/tmp/test# dpkg
Hi!
On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 19:27:55 -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 03:07:32PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The implementation in dpkg-dev already supports all of this
> > (see man Dpkg::Changelog::Debian), including:
>
> Section 3 manpages for Perl modules? Will wo
Hi!
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 09:57:43 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Source: dpkg
> Version: 1.8.22
> Severity: wishlist
> after that implementation, uploading a changes file results in a
> missing description on the PTS website.
> e.g. bglibs on experimental
> https://packages.qa.debian.org
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:37:15 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.15.4.1
> Severity: wishlist
> File: /usr/bin/dpkg-gencontrol
> It would be nice to have support for a Description field in the source
> stanza of debian/control.
> 1) Various pieces of Debian infrastr
5 matches
Mail list logo