Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files

2018-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > This feature is a very bad idea. I can see why people thought it > > might be nice: it means you can use the same (or very similar) .dsc > > (and perhaps vcs history) on different distros. > Disagreeing here... > The vendor.series

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files [and 1 more messages]

2018-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > FAOD I feel very strongly about this. The bug is over a year old. > > Can the Policy Editors please tell me when it would be apprropiate to > > escalate this to the TC ? > So

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files [and 1 more messages]

2018-04-18 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Ian Jackson wrote: > FAOD I feel very strongly about this. The bug is over a year old. > Can the Policy Editors please tell me when it would be apprropiate to > escalate this to the TC ? Sorry, I wrote my other e-mail before reading this. ISTM that we can move towar

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files

2018-04-18 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Simon, On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Simon McVittie wrote: > Based on his work on dgit, I believe Ian considers the canonical > contents of the source package to be the patches-applied > state. Developers who agree with this point of view would say that > applying patches is part of unpacking the so

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files [and 1 more messages]

2018-04-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Simon McVittie writes ("Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files"): > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 14:36:14 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:41:53 + Ian Jackson > > wrote: > > > But [vendor.series] is quite wrong, because it means that the same > > > sour

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files

2018-04-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 14:36:14 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:41:53 + Ian Jackson > wrote: > > But [vendor.series] is quite wrong, because it means that the same > > source package has different "contents" on different computers. > > The source package is always the same.

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files

2018-04-18 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi, On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:33:09 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > The vendor series files are mostly useless because most of the time you > want /additional/ vendor patches, but the vendor series files completely > replaces the original debian/patches/series which means you duplicate > the ma

Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific series files

2018-04-18 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Ian, just got pointed by someone to this bug report. On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:41:53 + Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev, debian-policy > Version: 1.17.27, 3.9.8.0 > > dpkg-source has a surprising and not-very-well-documented feature, > that it is possible to have in a `3.0 (quilt)' p

Bug#892664: dpkg: Please add support for zstd (Zstandard) compressed packages

2018-04-18 Thread Balint Reczey
Hi Guillem, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: > Hi Guillem > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 3:38 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 21:51:05 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: >>> Package: dpkg >>> Version: 1.19.0.5 >>> Severity: wishlist >>> Tags: patch >> >>> P