Hi Stephen,
Stephen Kitt wrote:
> We still need to figure out how to handle the triplet. There are multiple
> goals, from end users’ perspectives, some conflicting:
>
> * provide a Windows cross-compiler with a good selection of libraries, within
> Debian, so that it’s easy to build Windows
Simon McVittie schrob:
> Before Ubuntu switched from Upstart to systemd, they had a
> standalone implementation of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR as a PAM module, which as far
> as I'm aware is entirely init-system-agnostic:
> https://launchpad.net/pam-xdg-support
Heh, interesting. I wasn't aware of that,
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 09:30:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Jan Braun:
> > XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is a systemd-ism, and due to the way it is specified,
> > it's extremely unlikely to be implemented in other init systems.
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not implemented in the init system. It's implemented
by
Niels Thykier schrob:
> Having debhelper support/do this will have no influence on whether init
> or login systems will need to support it in the first place AFAICT.
True.
> The use case in debhelper is to setup an empty directory and point an
> ENV variable at it to ensure we get a defined
Jan Braun:
> Package: dpkg-dev,debhelper
> Followup-For: Bug #942111
> Control: reopen 942111
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Sorry for being late to the party.
> Please reconsider the XDG_RUNTIME_DIR part of this change.
>
> XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is a systemd-ism, and due to the way it is specified,
> it's
5 matches
Mail list logo
