On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Are either of those ports (armeb/arm64ilp32) actually useful / alive
> at this point?
Not that I have seen. I didn't think anything other than the IXP ever
really used big endian and that's a long time ago. arm64ilp32 seems
to ser
Processing control commands:
> tag 1054583 pending
Bug #1054583 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: really enable -fstack-clash-protection on
armhf/armel
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1054583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 03:23:10PM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
>Hi Guillem,
>
>On 2023-10-27 04:33, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Checking now again, I realize Wookey mentioned enabling this for the 3
>> arm arches (those would be arm64, armhf and armel), so the patch I
>> provided would match that. But
Hi Guillem,
On 2023-10-27 04:33, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Checking now again, I realize Wookey mentioned enabling this for the 3
> arm arches (those would be arm64, armhf and armel), so the patch I
> provided would match that. But I was wondering now what about armeb and
> arm64ilp32? I mean, I assu
4 matches
Mail list logo