Bug#826334: dget: removes existing dir by default without asking

2016-06-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 00:49 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 17:43:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev 1.17.27 > > Control: affects -1 devscripts > > Control: retitle -1 dpkg-source -x overwrites existing directories > >

Bug#719316: postinst scripts cannot tell whether this is the first installation

2013-08-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 18:07 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Now, we want to preserve the enabled/disabled state, i.e. on package > upgrades, we do _not_ want to re-enable the file and overwrite the > user’s choice. > > The best way to do this is: > > 1) call systemctl enable on the _initial_ p

Bug#623578: closed by Matthias Klose (Bug#623578: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-15)

2012-10-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 03:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Mmm, +b1 is indeed here, but dak is still REJECTing it, saying that > there is no such source version in unstable: > > python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15+b4_hurd-i386.deb: trying to install to > unstable, but could not find source The build log i

Bug#503058: dpkg-dev: [debchange] specifying the location of the changelog fails

2008-10-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
reassign 503058 devscripts thanks Hi, Sebastian Krysmanski wrote: When specifying a different location for the changelog file (i.e. not "debian/changelog") and using "--increment" the changelog file gets changed correctly but then the following error occurs: [...] It doesn't matter whether on

Bug#180127: reopening 262596, reopening 180127, reopening 139569

2008-09-07 Thread Adam D . Barratt
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # Closed by spam reopen 262596 reopen 180127 reopen 139569 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#452806: [debchange] dch -a shouldn't modify existing entries

2008-02-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 13:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Having had a look through the code, however, this appears to be simply for > convenience - the existing changelog has already been opened for reading at > this point and I can't see any immediate reason why we cou

Bug#452806: [debchange] dch -a shouldn't modify existing entries

2008-02-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[pkg-devscripts added to Cc] Adam D. Barratt wrote: Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 22 février 2008 à 00:07 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:47:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: debchange simply parses the output

Bug#452806: [debchange] dch -a shouldn't modify existing entries

2008-02-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 22 février 2008 à 00:07 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit : On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:47:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: debchange simply parses the output of dpkg-parsechangelog(1) in order to derive the

Bug#452806: [debchange] dch -a shouldn't modify existing entries

2008-02-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 00:07 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:47:21PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > debchange simply parses the output of dpkg-parsechangelog(1) in order to > > derive the changes. dpkg-pc is stripping the whitespace before debch

Bug#452806: reassign 452806 to dpkg-dev

2008-02-21 Thread Adam D . Barratt
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.15 # So near... reassign 452806 dpkg-dev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443243: dpkg -S says file is in a dependency package

2007-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 19:14 -0400, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Adam> That's the description in the package's control file; dpkg is > Adam> simply displaying it: > > The problem is that I cannot report a bug against gcc; reportbug says > "gcc is a dependency package, which real package do you mean?" > S

Bug#443243: dpkg -S says file is in a dependency package

2007-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:02 -0400, Ian Zimmerman wrote: [...] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -S /usr/share/doc/cpp/FAQ.gz > gcc: /usr/share/doc/cpp/FAQ.gz > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg --status gcc > Package: gcc > [...] > Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Architecture: i386 > Sou

Bug#423555: dpkg: errors from update-alternatives while setting up nano

2007-05-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 21:29 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.14.2 > Severity: serious > > Looks like update alternatives is not yet correct. Note that I was > upgrading from a previously good version of dpkg to the latest "fixed" > version. [...] > Setting up nano (2.0.6-1

Bug#422239: dpkg-buildpackage needs /bin/bash

2007-05-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Robert Millan wrote: Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.13.25 Severity: important Tags: patch dpkg-buildpackage seems to be making use of bash features, which makes it a bash script rather than an sh script. Attached patch fixes the shebang accordingly. imho, removing the bashism would be cleaner.

Bug#380332: dpkg: [CONFFILE] diff command should be configurable

2006-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
unmerge 380332 thanks On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 20:43 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2006-07-29 19:14:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > This appears to be another request as per #268154 and the seven others > > currently merged with it. Adding this report to the group... :) &g

Bug#380332: dpkg: [CONFFILE] diff command should be configurable

2006-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
merge 268154 380332 thanks On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:53 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.22 > Severity: wishlist > > The diff command used to show conffile diffs should be configurable, > at least in dpkg.cfg. For instance, one should be able to choose > colordiff to g

Bug#355915: dpkg -l ignores --root, --admindir

2006-03-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
retitle 355915 [DPKG] doesn't pass --admindir and --root to dpkg-query merge 355915 307715 thanks On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:05 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.11.0.1 > Severity: normal > > dpkg -l ignores --root: *sigh* Not only has this already been reported multiple t

Bug#352091: dpkg-query manpage

2006-02-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 18:59 +0100, Philippe Batailler wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.13 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > In the manpage dpkg-query.1, the option --showformat cannot be called with -f: > > "-f | --showformat=format" should be "--showformat=format". Really? It

Bug#316406: dpkg-dev : can not open fakeroot

2005-07-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Friday, July 01, 2005 6:03 AM, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I also got some strange things happening while building packages. > > Running "debuild" just keeps nothign visible happening. > > Running "fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage" drops me in a shellExiting > from that s