Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.21.1
Severity: important
Moin
dpkg-buildpackage started to feed "-s" into MAKEFLAGS if the "terse"
build option is set. This redefines terse as quiet, as all output of
make is silenced. I would see that in violation the policy definition
of the terse option and make
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.1.2
Severity: normal
dpkg-deb uses the -6 preset of xz by default, or at least documents it
this way. According to xz(1), this mode needs 9MiB of memory for
decompression (and 94MiB for compression).
This should be no problem for most mainstream arches. However for
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 09:52:38AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The missing architecture was my immediate thought as well, since for a
> > moment I thought ftp-master might need it, but then I realized that the
> > override settings are arch: all. So
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:52:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > dpkg-source rejects valid patch files:
> > | dpkg-source: error: diff
> > `xen/debian/patches/upstream-21334:993458f6c5a0+21405:ae381a864b4f' patches
> &
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.8.7
Severity: important
dpkg-source rejects valid patch files:
| dpkg-source: error: diff
`xen/debian/patches/upstream-21334:993458f6c5a0+21405:ae381a864b4f' patches
file xen/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/p2m-ept.c twice
Unified diff files are applied from the start to the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mike Hommey, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 10:07:55 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:18:17AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Hmm, ok so what about posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED)
> > > instead, skimming over the k
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:32:44AM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Most files won't, but consider a postinstall script which needs to
> scan/index a documentation file, or simply run one or more binaries
> that was just installed. I can definitely imagine situations where
> using POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED coul
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:22:25PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek writes ("Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression
> with ext4"):
> > Are there any plans to provide an API for atomic (non-durable) file
> > updates, not involving fsync?
> Yes. Such an API has already been def
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > A quick shows that this happens if the patch is unclean.
> Indeed, a first patch that can't be applied without having patch return an
> error code fails the heuristic above.
quilt nows that it can apply it.
> Unless you know a w
| dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
| dpkg-buildpackage: source package ibm-3270
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version 3.3.10ga4-2
| dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Bastian Blank
| dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386
| fakeroot debian/rules clean
| dh_testdir
| rm -rf
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The quilt usage in the "3.0 (quilt)" format is incompatible with normal
> > quilt. It uses debian/patches instead of patches.
> And what I am supposed to do
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:29:33PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > dpkg-source trashs local changes in the "3.0 (quilt)" format if
> > debian/patches is occupied by a different patch system, like the
> > linux-2.6 packa
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.2
Severity: important
The quilt usage in the "3.0 (quilt)" format is incompatible with normal
quilt. It uses debian/patches instead of patches.
Bastian
--
In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians.
-- Spock, "Wolf i
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.2
Severity: important
dpkg-source trashs local changes in the "3.0 (quilt)" format if
debian/patches is occupied by a different patch system, like the
linux-2.6 package uses.
| dpkg-source: info: local changes stored in
linux-2.6/debian/patches/debian-changes-2.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:13:26AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > dpkg-genchanges should fold lines in the output to a sane length. There
> > > is a package in the archi
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.22
Severity: grave
dpkg pre-depends on lzma which is still optional. See §2.5 Policy.
Bastian
--
Oh, that sound of male ego. You travel halfway across the galaxy and
it's still the same song.
-- Eve McHuron, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1330.1
--
To
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.20
Severity: normal
dpkg-genchanges should fold lines in the output to a sane length. There
is a package in the archive (linux-modules-extra-2.6) which produces a
25k long Binary line, which is cropped by gpg during signing.
Bastian
--
War isn't a good life, but
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:05:06PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Is that a build of the current source package "xen-unstable" on
> architecture amd64?
It is the version which just hit NEW. But xen-3 is also affected.
> Can you make a run with the "-v" option of dpkg-shlibdeps and send the
> log
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.16.6
dpkg-shlibdeps shows many libs as unused even if they are used.
| dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/xen-utils-unstable/usr/lib/xen-unstable/lib/libxenguest.so shouldn't be
linked with libxenctrl.so (it uses none of its symbols).
| $ objdump -T
debian/xen-util
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Severity: normal
Currently dpkg-genchanges barfs if debian/files contains the same
package with different architectures.
| $ dpkg-genchanges
| dpkg-genchanges: error: package linux-image-2.6-sb1-bcm91250a mips has
section devel in control file but base in files li
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of dpkg_1.13.11.1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-O1 -o dpkg archives.o cleanup.o
> configure.o depcon.o enquiry.o errors.o fi
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:30:32PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
> > accept such dependency lines.
> dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-spe
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: normal
#170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
accept such dependency lines.
Bastian
--
She won' go Warp 7, Cap'n! The batteries are dead!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.9
Severity: serious
dpkg fails to install if base-passwd is not configured and does not
declare a pre-dependency against. At this time, no /etc/passwd or /etc/group
exists, as base-passwd builds them in its postinstall script.
| Unpacking dpkg (from .../archives/dpkg_1
24 matches
Mail list logo
