(Dropping original bug, adding cloned bug, full quote for context)
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:38 AM Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 22:01:21 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Control: clone -1 -2
> > Control: retitle -2 start-stop-daemon: please implemen
On 15 November 2016 at 18:17, Wookey wrote:
> On 2016-11-15 15:53 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:22:12 + Wookey wrote:
>> > Package: dpkg
>> > Version: 1.18.10
>> > Severity: normal
>> >
>> > I built a large pa
t bug, but it needs more testing before it is accepted.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:22:58 +0100 Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + patch
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi Guillem,
>
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > The /usr merge violates core assumptions in dpkg-shlibdeps. The reason
> > > that amd64 isn't broken is sheer luck.
t one for which dpkg-query returns a
positive result. That would be an API break on libdpkg-perl though.
[1]
https://sources.debian.net/src/dpkg/1.18.13/scripts/Dpkg/Shlibs.pm/#L161-L166
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
On 1 Sep 2016 3:59 a.m., "Johannes Schauer" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:10 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> > overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
> > live in the lower filesystem:
> >
> > * Directory
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.10
Severity: normal
Hi,
overlayfs does not support renaming directories when the directories
live in the lower filesystem:
* Directory renames only allowed on "pure upper" (already created on
* upper filesystem, never copied up). Directories which are on lower or
On 16 May 2016 at 20:23, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 20:01:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.18.7
>> Severity: minor
>> File: /usr/bin/dpkg-query
>
>> The dpkg-query manpage says:
>>
>> >
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.7
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-query
The dpkg-query manpage says:
> It contains the abbreviated package status, such as “ii” (since dpkg 1.16.2).
That turns out to be misleading, since the actual variable contains a
trailing space:
$ dpkg-query --showformat='$
On 11 October 2015 at 13:45, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Please implement this helper in dpkg-maintscript-helper;
Please find attached a patch to kickstart the discussion.
Documentation is missing. accept_conffile will move a .dpkg-bak file
left from rm_conffile if upgrading from a version ol
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
On a couple pam modules[1] we see the following pattern:
if [ "$1" = remove ] && [ "${DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE_REFCOUNT:-1}" = 1];
then
: remove stuff
fi
However, this idiom is incorrect. Because REFCOUNT tracks the number of
packages that
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:47:06 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Consider the original motivation for this. You have a package A, which
> > contains a daemon B and an init script /etc/init.d/B. You split B and
> > its init script (and any other configurat
rise to abuses such as setting parallel=n in the control
file.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
El 23/06/08 09:45 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> El 23/06/08 02:37 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > > > I don't know if we want to put both in the same module or if we need
> > > > to come up with a different name (or a sub-module maybe).
> > >
> > >
handle a given option simply ignores it, and that options can have
any type. As such, I think it is a good idea to provide separate modules,
since it makes the Build-Options support simpler.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
El 22/06/08 05:15 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Attaching a version against current master (since this can't make it to
> > lenny anyway).
> >
> > PS: an (N)ACK would be nice.
>
> We have received y
Attaching a version against current master (since this can't make it to lenny
anyway).
PS: an (N)ACK would be nice.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
From c738302e1c913cb23bd54cf9059f63580018ed0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:
Attaching a newer version of the patch that does a better search for the
options. The search should be put probably on a subroutine, but I'm not
really sure where, and there is only one build option for now, so it's not a
major problem.
--
Felipe Sa
stuff to do?
--
Felipe Sateler
From 821c5ae3860f0314daf0fa2c19a7d36f2c5c2dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:11:11 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for Build-Options.
Add Build-Options as a legal keyword in the source control file
19 matches
Mail list logo
