At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:16:14 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> #317082 is "moreinfo". Has a decision been made on how to fix this?
> If not, frankly it should be downgraded to "important", because it only
> hurts biarch -- meaning it isn't actually a blocker for any single
> subarchitecture -- and
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:24:14 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> There is already an inofficial buildd for the ppc64 architecture
> running for 'unstable'. The respective ppc64 package archive is located at
>
> deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable main
>
> and almost 95% of all sou
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:05:42 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> I guess you will generally have many more issues than this one when you
> try to build 64-bit packages on a 32-bit buildd (e.g. compiling and
> running 64-bit programs from configure scripts, running 'make check' or
> 'make test' targe
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:00:23 +0100,
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I don't think this is just a dpkg-dev bug, these "bi-arch" systems need
> to provide ldd or an equivalent that can read either form of shared
> library that it would support.
>
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes ca
merge 322953 317082
severity 317082 serious
thanks
At Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:28:23 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'glibc' on in a clean chroot on powerpc/unstable,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch /glibc-2.3.5/stamp-dir/install_libc
> Installing ppc64
> rm -rf /glibc-2.3.5/debia
5 matches
Mail list logo
