Hi
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 16:35:44 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:37:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Both look like the same problem, which would be a regression from the
> > recent rework of the Makefile fragments. I'm CCing Nicolas as a
> > head
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:37:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Both look like the same problem, which would be a regression from the
> recent rework of the Makefile fragments. I'm CCing Nicolas as a
> heads-up, and I'm looking into this to try to do a quick fix upload.
So there's
Control: forcemerge -1 1076939
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 12:17:21 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.8
> While building some packages I get weird errors like this:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package 'aspell-nl' in '../aspell-nl_2.20.19-2_all.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-07-19 at 14:49:20 +0200, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> Previous implementation was preventing one expansion with $(value),
> but this quotation is now counter-productive.
>
> Three commits are attached:
> 2/ regression test
> 3/ patch
> 1/ an unrelated suggestion inspired by
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-07-19 at 04:02:18 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.7
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Graham Inggs
> I suspect dpkg 1.22.7 to cause a regression when building
> nvidia-cuda-toolkit, e.g.
>
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 01:30:48 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > A workaround is to detect the dpkg version in use, and if it's >= 1.20.1,
> > add --force-remove-protected to the dpkg command-line.
>
> The expected way to detect whether you might need to pass that opt
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 15:24:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: wishlist
> Before Debian trixie, login was Essential; now it's merely Protected
> (included in normal installations, but removable).
>
> In minimal container environments where logins
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-10 at 22:45:01 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > Please allow Merge Requests at https://salsa.debian.org/dpkg-team/dpkg
> > > so that it is easier for others to contribute to the package.
> >
> > These repos are just mirrors (I've updated the repo descriptions there
> >
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 04:43:40 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 17:29:49 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > There's another regression that I found on various BSDs, where they
> > already have GNU make 4.4.1, where the buildtools test fails for the
> >
Hi!
On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 17:29:49 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> There's another regression that I found on various BSDs, where they
> already have GNU make 4.4.1, where the buildtools test fails for the
> AR and AR_FOR_BUILD checks, and I've not managed to track down yet
> what
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 12:32:45 +0200, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> You have not applied
> 0001-scripts-mk-stop-hard-coding-dpkg_datadir.patch
> probably because you prefer the related parts in
> f1175056 (build: Rework subst handling for built or installed artifacts).
As I think I
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 10:57:20 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 03/06/24 01:24, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I guess we could special case the native build one and then copying
> > them over, although this could incur build failures at this point in
> > time. :/
>
Hi!
On Sat, 2024-06-01 at 10:13:04 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.6
> during native builds, dpkg-buildflags returns an empty CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD. The
> same happens for CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD, LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD and other *_FOR_BUILD
> variables.
>
> Given that
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 04:37:18 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2024-04-29 03:05:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I don't think dpkg is at fault here, I assume something else is either
> > getting activated in the middle of the transaction while the package
> > man
Control: forcemerge 330256 -1
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 14:28:49 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> tags 1006655 + patch
> thanks
>
> I've attached a patch implementing an rm_conffile_if_unmodifed command
> for dpkg-maintscript-helper, as well as a declarative version for
> debian/conffiles.
>
>
Hi!
On Sun, 2024-05-19 at 07:09:24 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.6
> Severity: normal
> Trying to decrease the boot time of a desktop system (pressing the power
> button to GDM login screen), I noticed `dpkg-db-backup.service` in the
> hotpath:
[…]
> It’d be great
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 18:19:18 +, Ben Ferreri wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.6
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: bferr...@intwineconnect.com
> When attempting to install a package as a non-superuser, the configured
> pre-invoke hook runs, but the post-invoke hook does not. I
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 22:36:12 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> dpkg postinst fails to create the start-stop-daemon compatibility
> symlink if /usr does not exist:
>
> ln: failed to create symbolic
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 00:01:02 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
>
> * Vincent Lefevre [240428 22:33]:
> > Package: fdisk
> > Version: 2.40-8
> > Severity: serious
> ...
> > Setting up util-linux (2.40-8) ...
> > fstrim.service is a
nother one refactoring
the functions (which I had pending on doing).
Thanks,
Guillem
From 93e7b2268fabc35d754ffe6389b5172b5917eb8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 22:44:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] src: Check whether SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set before parsing it
The dpkg-deb and dpkg-
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 16:29:17 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (2022-10-10 12:23:58)
> > On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 22:13:34 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> > wrote:
> > As mentioned on IRC, the problem here (and on #825385
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 15:22:45 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-04-09, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've now finished the change I had in that branch, which implements
> > support so that dpkg-buildpackage can be passed a .dsc or a source-dir,
> > and in the form
e speed
> gain
> architecture.mk 30 times faster (probably no gain under dpkg-buildpackage)
> buildflags.mk 20 times faster
> pkg-info.mk 4 times faster
> buildtools.mk20% faster
>
> Guillem Jover
> > I've left this one out f
nstead
> of
> the attached patch.
The problem with this solution is that it is prone do accidental use,
as it is very easy for a user to unknowingly have recreated the sources
from a locally extracted tree (be that modified or not).
On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 02:57:40 +0200, Guille
Hi!
On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 02:56:02 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.6
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> A thought I already wrote in a recent debian-devel discussion:
>
> In theory source package filenames should be
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 dpkg-buildflags: Enable frame pointers by default
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 09:56:38 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: gcc-14
> Severity: wishlist
> Please consider enabling frame pointers on 64 bit arches.
> See:
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 09:54:36 +, Grueninger, Tobias wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.12
> Severity: wishlist
> In our case we did install a package from a 3rd party which apparently
> uses a non-conforming .deb package building tool (unknown to us)
> resulting in a malformed
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 19:05:59 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:59:31PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Package: debsig-verify
> >> Version: 0.23+b2
> >> Severity:
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 18:00:30 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:18:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
> >or so. Looking now...
No worries, hope you are doing well now! :)
> And I can confirm that
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 04:25:03 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2024-03-07 03:34:08 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > "apt-cache show libc6-dev" also lists this package.
> >
> > apt behaves differently, this has been also a known discrepancy, bu
Hi!
On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 02:18:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.6
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek
> 3. Code that does still compile with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
>but behaves differently, e.g. due to failing autoconf tests
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 23:59:31 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > diff --git a/src/openpgp-gpg.c b/src/openpgp-gpg.c
> > index 4c29b7f..97ec3a4 100644
> > --- a/src/openpgp-gpg.c
> > +++ b/src/openpgp
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 11:21:32 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.4
> Severity: normal
> User: de...@kali.org
> Usertags: origin-kali
> Kali Linux is a rolling distro based on Debian testing. We go with a
> merged-usr layout for a while now, and therefore with
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 10:59:36 -0700, Cordell Bloor wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.5
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@slerp.xyz, debian...@lists.debian.org
> When packaging the AMD ROCm GPU libraries for Debian, we are currently
> using CXX=hipcc or CXX=clang++ to build
Hi!
On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 16:46:33 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 16:11:36 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - please provide an opt-out option.
>
> This is a bug, which I should fix.
The first attached patch is what I'd use to fix this.
> >
On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 16:57:28 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.03.24 16:46, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 16:11:36 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > I just filed another bug report for bc, together with the one for heimdal.
> > >
> > > Pl
Hi!
On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 16:11:36 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> I just filed another bug report for bc, together with the one for heimdal.
>
> Please turn this off for a while, it's really harmful for the time64
> bootstrap.
This was added on request by Steve,
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 20:10:20 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-02-26 19:23:58 [+0100], Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > | 89s +xz: Reduced the number of threads from 16 to 8 to not exceed the
> > > memory usage limit of 1400 MiB
> > > | 89s +xz: Reduced
Hi!
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 18:57:32 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.4
> Severity: important
> xz-utils 5.6.0 has been uploaded to unstable. A changed behaviour of
> `xz' is now that mutlti threaded compress/ decompression is now enabled
> by default. This
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 04:37:47 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.4
> Severity: normal
> dpkg-query manpage says:
> EXIT STATUS
>0 The requested query was successfully performed.
>
>1 The requested query failed either fully or
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 19:18:15 +, Aidan Gallagher wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.20.12
> Severity: wishlist
> File: /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage
> Tags: newcomer
> X-Debbugs-Cc: aidg...@gmail.com
> I'm creating a wrapper around dpkg-buildpackage that allows package
> builds to run
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 16:47:34 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:16 PM Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 13:46:53 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg
> > > Version: 1.21.22
> > > Severity: important
> >
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 13:46:53 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: important
> On unpacking a custom .dpkg file with long symbolic links, I found a
> bunch of symbolic links ending in right, and one with copyright. The
> overrun made all the links
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 15:39:33 +0100, Peter Krefting wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n
> With PERL5OPTS=-Mutf8 and PERL_UNICODE=SDL set in environment [1], output from
> dpkg-buildpackage (and others) is garbled ("double" UTF-8 encoding):
>
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 12:05:00 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.2
> Tags: patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: dep17m2
> please move /sbin/start-stop-daemon to /usr for the /usr-move aka DEP17.
> It's the last file in dpkg that needs moving and since it is
Hi!
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 11:37:30 +0800, xiao sheng wen wrote:
> 在 2024/1/5 11:09, Guillem Jover 写道:
> > > So, my question is:
> > >
> > > Can dpkg-checkbuilddeps read
> > >
> > > ||BuildProfileSpec "Registered profile names"pkg.$sourc
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 12:35:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.2
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hurd
> aarch64-gnu support is coming too :)
Yes, I noticed! :)
> Could you add a hurd-amd64 case in
'/usr/share/dupload/openpgp-check %1' failed
> > for emmax_0~beta.20100307-4_riscv64-buildd.changes
Ouch, ok.
> > On 2023-12-22 12:16, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Just to understand what is going wrong, I assume you don't have the
> > >
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 10:53:18 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Package: dupload
> Version: 2.10.4
> Severity: grave
> This version fail to check a signature. Work fine with 2.10.3
>
> ,
> | $ debrelease
> | dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
> | Checking OpenPGP signatures
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 23:33:47 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 08:06:56PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I realized now that this cannot be set for CXXFLAGS as at least g++
> > will warn about that. And I've gone for now by depending on qa=+bug,
>
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Package: debsig-verify
> Version: 0.23+b2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> Updating our derived distro from bullseye to bookworm, we've moved on
> from 0.23 to 0.28. We're using subkeys for signing our debs, and that
> no
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 10:52:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I guess I could do it the other way, and given this is apparently
> causing issues as reported by Adrian, and as seen recently from
> the referenced bug report which might require patching a specific
> package to
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 19:00:59 +0100, Hugo Melder wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.0
> Severity: important
> The recent change (https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=11efff1bf)
> breaks building Debian packages with clang on arm64.
So in
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 23:43:29 +0100, Marc Jeanmougin wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.1
> Severity: important
> Since 1.22 (does happen in 1.22.1, did not happen in 1.21.21),
> running "dpkg-shlibdeps --version" prints
>
> ---
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot read debian/control:
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 13:12:48 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > There are some problems with this:
> > >
> > > 1. PIE sho
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 12:55:32 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 11:40:53 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.22.0
> > Severity: normal
> > -fstack-clash-protection is supposed to be enabled by default on amd64,
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 19:27:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: reassign -1 dpkg
> control: retitle -1 dpkg: stat fails on 32-bit systems when access time is
> bogus
> On 2023-10-25 23:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 20:53:57 +0200, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
> > > I
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:44:26 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:11:32AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Right, nice catch! Given that these fields are based on what might
> > appear on build dependencies, I think it does make sense to consider
> > t
arm-based arches which might
not support this. I've queued the attached patch for my next push.
I'll try to get a release out during the weekend.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 59234629857aa5910e27d0fadb3dfe29fbb3996d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:48:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH
On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 07:59:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.0
> Severity: minor
> The use of Maintainer in the output of dpkg-parsechangelog is
> confusing, because it suggests that dpkg-parsechangelog is reporting
> the Maintainer field from debian/control. I
Hi!
[ In the future make sure to send mails to the Debian bug tracker as
plain not-flowed text, otherwise that messes up with the pseudo-header
formatting. Thanks! ]
On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 09:31:01 +0800, yalingfang wrote:
> Package: dpkg Version: 1.22.0 Severity: normal Tags: patch User:
>
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 s-s-d: On kFreeBSD fails to find deleted exec filename
On Sat, 2023-10-07 at 14:16:08 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> kFreeBSD has been removed from Debian ports:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2023/07/msg3.html
This report is still a
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 20:17:58 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.18.8
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 src:zsh src:poppler src:libjodycode src:doxygen
> src:jemalloc src:jdupes src:libsdl2 src:iproute2
> Any test stanza in a debian/tests/control file
[ CCing #910377 for some context. ]
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:59:47 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> > The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to
> > system operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For
> > example, a reboot during a background
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
[ Reason ]
This update backports the loong64 arch support as requested in #1051763
because some of the
On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 09:20:46 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 22:34 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I guess I could backport it to dpkg 1.20.x for oldstable, but if the
> > infra servers are going to be upgraded soon (at least out of oldstabl
Tags: fixed -1 1.21.21
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 12:05:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: loong64
> X-Debbugs-Cc: zhangjial...@loongson.cn,zhangdan...@loongson.cn
> In order to be able to
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 15:43:02 +0200, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.22.0
> Severity: normal
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> using: dpkg-source --commit
>
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
>
>
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-09-02 at 16:43:57 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.0
> Severity: normal
> Upgrading dpkg stops the dpkg-db-backup.timer, which seems rather
> undesirable, as it the timer remains inactive until the next reboot or
> until it is started manually:
[…]
Ah!
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 12:51:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 16:09:40 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > OK. We're all agreed on that then. Guillem can stick it in the next
> > dpkg upload.
So this happened, and Johannes reported that this seems to be breaking
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 23:25:23 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Following the procedure to modify default dpkg-buildflags I propose to
> enable -fstack-clash-protection on amd64. The bug for dpkg tracking this
> is #918914.
>
> | -fstack-clash-protection
> | Generate code to prevent stack
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 16:09:40 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2023-06-27 16:58 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Am Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:41:36PM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca:
> > > On 2022-10-26 08:20, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > > I think this should rather be applied early after the
Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 18:28:57 +, Mcgiwer wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
> There seem to be problem with the packages dependencies.
If there is a problem with package dependencies, then that should
probably be assigned to the
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-08-03 at 03:29:54 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
>
> I tried to use build profiles for the first time today, and after
> running into trouble with pbuilder I tried to run it manually and
>
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 19:36:46 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tliko...@iki.fi
> Dpkg installs systemd timer unit dpkg-db-backup.timer which is supposed
> to run daily:
>
> #
Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev
Control: retitle -1 dpkg-vendor: Support reading vendor info from /usr
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: block -1 by 695781
On Sat, 2023-07-15 at 19:42:25 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Usertags: conffiles-reduction
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi!
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:31:35 +, Luca Koroll wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 9.9+deb9u11
> Severity: important
> after rebooting my system and trying to update my packages an error with
> the base-files package occured which brought me
Hi!
Just noticed this change to the GNU config project which I wanted to
add a reference here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=91f6a7f616b161c25ba2001861a40e662e18c4ad
Thanks,
Guillem
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 14:24:02 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:56:28AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 21:18:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg-dev
> > > Version: 1.21.22
> > &g
anks,
Guillem
From 0689b5b4a144d9d7c2171a12f6ff84da63a61892 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 23:49:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dpkg: Handle non-existent .dpkg-tmp files on read-only
filesystems
On read-only filesystems trying to rename a directory or a file will
f
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-al...@lists.debian.org, debian-i...@lists.debian.org
> Since stretch all release architectures are using PIE by default,
> and all future release
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 01:02:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 19:46:11 +0300, VSYakovetsky wrote:
> > Package: libdpkg-perl
> > Version: 1.21.22ubuntu1
> > Severity: minor
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: vsyakovet...@gmail.com
> >* W
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 19:32:04 +0200, Sebastian Kayser wrote:
> even though it's not 100% of what I expected this LGTM. What would you think
> about retaining the link to the Debian Policy?
Yeah, as I mentioned that would be backwards, and while I can recognize
it might seem inconvenient,
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 19:46:11 +0300, VSYakovetsky wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.21.22ubuntu1
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vsyakovet...@gmail.com
>* What led up to the situation?
> - building deb package with dpkg-buildpackage and clang
> - hardcoded
kg behavior and not the other way
around. So perhaps something along the lines like the attachment
instead, while probably not what you were looking for, is something
that feels acceptable for inclusion.
Thanks,
Guillem
From dbbb968d8e92f816de9538653ee70d19b08a3681 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:57:41 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so
> > my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still apply,
Control: reassign -1 xinit
Hi!
[ It seems this got misfiled, leaving the bulk of the mail for context. ]
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 00:30:04 +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> here are a few notes and fixes
ething parseable appended «, » or
similar. In any case I think I'll add this to my list of things to
revisit in the patch tagging guidelines for when I start that
discussion. For now I've queued the attached patch.
Thanks,
Guillem
From a4f63404cd0e6deb8e771bd5ebf9bc52b398e8d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 11:31:54 +0800, beks...@westnet.com.au wrote:
> I've found some info on the previous bug about this problem.
>
> The previous bug in Debian 11 was 993154, submitted about 28 August
> 2021.
Yes, last time the conclusion was that a faulty USB drive
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 08:14:08 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.21
> Severity: minor
> Do not know if it is the right place but a dpkg-buildpackage bissection tool
> that will allow to bissect the debian/patches queue will be
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-04-22 at 12:07:07 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.21
> Severity: wishlist
>
> When building libvirt, dpkg-gensymbols currently produces the
> following output:
>
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libvirt0/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match
>
Hi!
[ Leaving most mail context for Colin (in CC). ]
On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 01:47:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 06:16:52 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.20.12
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > on many of my systems
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 21:18:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.22
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic patch
> The discussion on debian-devel around 64-bit time_t has died down, so I
> figure it's time to
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-05-28 at 10:26:46 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.22
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
> I was playing around with doing a custom name space for Rules-Requires-Root,
> and then dpkg said it owned the namespace:
>
> ```
> $ grep
Hi!
On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 10:27:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.9
> Severity: wishlist
> Packages that have a plugin architecture, like glib2.0 and gdk-pixbuf,
> often want to know the multiarch tuple in their maintainer scripts so
> that they can enumerate
esystems and types of disks to see whether there would be
significant performance degradation/regression.
Thanks,
Guillem
From b93783b16b75eea334d82221cf5a71af5ba1ff99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 01:26:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libdpkg: Do not unnecessaril
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.22 upload.
[ Reason ]
I got a report for a segfault privately (as the reporter
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 10:12:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> If you talk about the baseline ABI according to hardware, yeah, this
> is still open.
> Thanks for more background here. I thought this might lead to a wider
> discussion before solid ABI as pabs' suggestion.
Given the ongoing discussion,
possible in the near future.)
Thanks,
Guillem
From d71a98c23c43a06650e90480e864c0e3da344437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bo YU
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:50:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arch: Add support for riscv32 CPU
[guil...@debian.org:
- Adapt the test suite.
- Add ABI checking support. ]
Closes: #1034756
Signed-off-by: Gui
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 17:11:26 +0800, Torrekie wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.21.19
> Source: dpkg
> Severity: minor
> When installing dpkg 1.21.19 from source, I got several pod2man
> warnings that indicates some of the documentations has not been
> correctly generated.
> $
1 - 100 of 1719 matches
Mail list logo
