In the interest of considering all possibilities,
it seems to me that it might also be possible to
a.) make issuing these warnings configurable, or
b.) back them out altogether.
Thanks,
Kingsley
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
dpkg has been an enormous time saver for me over
the years.
Thank you very much for maintaining it.
Unfortunately, I ran into this bug too.
At least for me, the above ruby script only fixed
a small fraction of /var/lib/dpkg/status.
I'm considering various fixes.
Would it be OK if every entry
If it's OK for every entry in /var/lib/dpkg/status
to end up having an Architecture: line, then
how would one know whether to specify an
architecture of
all
or (in my case)
i386?
Thanks,
Kingsley
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 08/16/08 07:00, Guillem Jover wrote:
What would be the use of such an option?
[...]
Finding installation and removal scripts,
especially to debug them.
Thanks,
Kingsley
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Severity: wishlist
I still find dpkg useful and would like to humbly
suggest adding an option like --listfiles, but
which also lists files in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/package.*
For example, the new option would also list files
like
5 matches
Mail list logo