On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 06:45:56PM -0500, Tim Shepard wrote:
IMHO it is not appropriate to label this bug "wishlist", for the
documentation is leading the user astray while attempting to point the
user at the complete documentation. It is at least a documentation
bug. We cannot expect all users
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:12:23AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
This is more complicated than that, since it involves at least some of
"testing", and perhaps even some downgrading.
Ok, there's no way I can duplicate or reproduce that. Once you start
downgrading you're moving into "on your own"
At this point I have no idea how a system could get into this state.
Could someone run some upgrades to try to duplicate? (I can't.)
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:29:22PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Until your package is ready to provide md5sum itself, we need something
to make sure it's there -- we can't have a system without it. The
diversion has been working for the last six months, and seems to have
not upset anybody.
reopen 313605
thanks
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:19:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:57 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.9
Severity: serious
dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another package. dpkg did this by placing a local diversion. This local
diversion does not (by definition) have
6 matches
Mail list logo
