Bug#511152: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -v0 does not work

2009-01-07 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.23 Severity: normal I've just found that if I pass '-v0' to dpkg-buildpackage (meaning 'include changelog since version 0'), then -v0 parameter is not passed to dpkg-genchanges. This is caused by the line if ($since) { push @change_opts, "-v$since" } because if $

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > won't point to directories with local libraries. > > That's not true. ldd will just happily print "libfoo.so.1 =&g

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps > > > -l option because it doesn't

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is > > garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the > > script) are attached. > > > > Comments and/or testing welcome. > > Comment to my

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello people. > > > objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the > > > other shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch > > > which is of critical importance to get this stuff right. > > > > Hmm... > > But what for is that search path? > > As far as I understand

Bug#322926: merging changes files breaks wrappers (like debuild)

2005-12-07 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:42:40AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Devscripts may handle this situation by just picking not > > $package_$version_$arch.changes, but instead find the file that > > matches $package_$version_*.changes pattern. > > In one of the

Bug#322926: merging changes files breaks wrappers (like debuild)

2005-12-03 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> I tried to reproduce the situation where 'source+arch' appears, but > failed. > > And, as far as I can read the code, dpkg-cross version of > dpkg-buildpackage should not do this. > > First, before doing any .changes processing, it checks if there are > exactly two files that match pattern ${pack

Bug#322926: merging changes files breaks wrappers (like debuild)

2005-12-03 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hi, > > > If dpkg-cross is installed, it provides it's own dpkg-buildpackage, > > > which potentially replaces the *_${arch}.changes file with > > > *_source+${arch}.changes. When debuild calls helpers like lintian or > > > debsign, these will fail because debuild assumes the > > > *_${arch}.chang

Bug#322926: merging changes files breaks wrappers (like debuild)

2005-12-02 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:32:07PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > Package: dpkg-cross, devscripts, dpkg-dev > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > If dpkg-cross is installed, it provides it's own dpkg-buildpackage, > > > which

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2005-08-21 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the other > shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch which is of > critical importance to get this stuff right. Hmm... But what for is that search path? As far as I understand, dpkg-shlibdeps should just get NEEDED so

Bug#322926: merging changes files breaks wrappers (like debuild)

2005-08-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Package: dpkg-cross, devscripts, dpkg-dev > Severity: normal > > If dpkg-cross is installed, it provides it's own dpkg-buildpackage, > which potentially replaces the *_${arch}.changes file with > *_source+${arch}.changes. When debuild calls helpers like lintian or > debsign, these will fail beca