On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:59:31PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Package: debsig-verify
>> Version: 0.23+b2
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: patch
>
>> Updating our derived distro from bu
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:18:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi Guillem,
>
>Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
>or so. Looking now...
And I can confirm that your changes work here for our system too.
Thanks!
--
Steve McIntyre, C
Hi Guillem,
Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
or so. Looking now...
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:22:08AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 23:59:31 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve
Package: debsig-verify
Version: 0.23+b2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hey Guillem,
Updating our derived distro from bullseye to bookworm, we've moved on
from 0.23 to 0.28. We're using subkeys for signing our debs, and that
no longer works. I can see that the change you've made to no longer
32 as far as
>I'm aware. I'd suggest enabling the feature only on armhf/armel for the
>time being.
Are either of those ports (armeb/arm64ilp32) actually useful / alive
at this point?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane
: trustdb created
gpg: Good signature from "Steve McIntyre " [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 8363 C3DB 2B16 5A8C 8EB7 A6E3 3E44 B9BF 5EC6 F
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:42:26PM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
>On 02/02/2017 02:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Dropping the -nostdlib argument to the gcc call inside sonames2elf
>> makes a difference - it'll add libc6 to the mix and force the output
>> to match the system you
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 05:10:14AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 15:34:04 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Please don't go down that route, the ABI flags are intended to save
>> people from that. I'm curious what's going wrong with libgsm1 he
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:03:13PM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
>On 02/01/2017 04:34 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Please don't go down that route, the ABI flags are intended to save
>> people from that. I'm curious what's going wrong with libgsm1 here
>> such that we'r
worried about EABIv4, does the logic of the dpkg checker not
match the checks we added in glibc itself?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Specialty
severity 634961 important
retitle 634961 testsuite fails if not built using fakeroot
thanks
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: minor
[ severity minor as armhf isn't a release architecture yet
Building dpkg, I'm seeing test
it would be useful ? Do you have comments and suggestions ?
I'm uncomfortable with the idea of (even more?) build-time package
settings being hidden away outside of debian/control. :-/
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
I suspect most samba developers
12 matches
Mail list logo
