On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:25 -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
> > > accept such dependency lines.
> > >
> > dpkg
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> reopen 170575
> merge 170575 324741
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
> > accept such dependency lines.
> >
> dpkg has _never_ had supp
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:30:32PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
> > accept such dependency lines.
> dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-specific Depend lines,
reopen 170575
merge 170575 324741
thanks
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:21 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> #170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
> accept such dependency lines.
>
dpkg has _never_ had support for arch-specific Depend lines, just
Build-Depend. That bug s
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: normal
#170575 was marked fixed some time ago, but the version in sid does not
accept such dependency lines.
Bastian
--
She won' go Warp 7, Cap'n! The batteries are dead!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
5 matches
Mail list logo
