Greetings! Just a quick note here -- I'd be most happy to tailor
these to the needs of the community. I have an experimental gfortran
atlas about ready for upload. Alas, I'll be away from the office for
one week -- hope to get to it when I return.
Take care,
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:44:21PM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> 7) If dpkg was reverted not to re-order Build-Depends, I could force
>> refblas3gf to be installed first, satisfying the dependency of lapack3gf
>> on "atlas3gf-base | refblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf" and preventi
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:44:21PM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> 7) If dpkg was reverted not to re-order Build-Depends, I could force
> refblas3gf to be installed first, satisfying the dependency of lapack3gf
> on "atlas3gf-base | refblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf" and preventing the
> attempted insta
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> 5) Until recently this was just an annoyance. But now that we are going
> through the gfortran -> g77 transition, lapack3 and refblas3 (runtime
Typing too fast; of course I meant "g77 -> gfortran transition"
sorry for the confusion,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTEC
Dear dpkg maintainers,
Let me present to you a situation caused by the change to dpkg-dev to
install Build-Depends in alphabetical order:
1) atlas3-base-dev package provides an alternative version of
liblapack.so and libblas.so to the packages refblas3-dev and lapack3-dev
2) Maintainer of those
5 matches
Mail list logo
