Bug#477954: Issues with git source packages

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 09:48:58AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:05:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > For "remotes" I might disagree however, it can make sense to keep them as > > one might want to be able to push/pull from the remote repository used for > > the mainte

Bug#477954: Issues with git source packages

2008-05-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:05:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > For "remotes" I might disagree however, it can make sense to keep them as > one might want to be able to push/pull from the remote repository used for > the maintenance. Of course, usage of "git clone" makes it more difficult > to p

Bug#477954: Issues with git source packages

2008-05-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
severity 477954 normal thanks I'm CCing Joey who wrote the initial support for the git source package. He might want to provide his input and maybe even a patch. Release managers agreed to push changes/fixes in lenny for the new source package formats since they are not used in lenny at all. In r