On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc.):
forcemerge 560070 586691
thanks
...
We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560070
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
Unfortunately I don't think that would be acceptable for a stable
update, as some maintainers started relying on dpkg-buildpackage's
behaviour of setting those flags and stopped setting them in their
rules files. So there's a chance of regressions. If
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc.):
forcemerge 560070 586691
thanks
...
We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560070 be
fixed in a stable release update ?
We're migrating to a situation
Hi!
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 11:19:27 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc.):
forcemerge 560070 586691
thanks
...
We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560070
4 matches
Mail list logo