Hi!
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 22:42:49 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
New version attached. It includes your changes, plus the
documentation fixes you suggested.
I've now come back to this and it indeed does make sense and looks sane.
I've some comments below, that once fixed I'll be comfortable
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:36:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
Hi Guillem!
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 22:42:49 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
New version attached. It includes your changes, plus the
documentation fixes you suggested.
I've now come back to this and it indeed does make sense
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 21:00:47 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:36:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 22:42:49 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
New version attached. It includes your changes, plus the
documentation fixes you suggested.
I've now come
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 21:00:47 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:36:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
The comment about it being introduced recently seems misplaced here.
I've changed these to 1.16.4. This
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:53:07PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
New version attached. It includes your changes, plus the
documentation fixes you suggested.
Looks good to me.
Super. If you need anything further, I'll be happy to do more
work on it.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:53:07PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
New version attached. It includes your changes, plus the
documentation fixes you suggested.
Looks good to me.
Super. If you need anything further, I'll be happy to do more
work on it. If not, do you
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:48:02AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
- } elsif (m/^Build-(Depends|Conflicts)(-Indep)?$/i) {
+ } elsif (m/^Build-(Depends|Conflicts)(-Arch|-Indep)?$/i) {
That’s all it takes? Looks very sane.
The only missing pieces I see are some tiny nits mentioned
Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm a bit busy for the next week (thesis submission), but I'll take
care of all the points you've raised in early October as time allows,
and I'll get an updated patch back to you.
Thanks. Here's another tweak to consider when the time comes.
With the proposed semantics,
found 629480 dpkg/1.16.1
quit
Roger Leigh wrote:
dpkg currently supports
Build-Depends (arch all and any)
Build-Depends-Indep (arch all)
and the same Build-Conflicts.
This patch adds
Build-Depends-Arch (arch any)
and Build-Conflicts-Arch.
Sorry for the slow reply. Let’s see.
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
dpkg currently supports
Build-Depends (arch all and any)
Build-Depends-Indep (arch all)
and the same Build-Conflicts.
This patch adds
Build-Depends-Arch (arch any)
and Build-Conflicts-Arch.
This makes the support for build
10 matches
Mail list logo
