Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: dpkg Version: 1.21.19 Followup-For: Bug #733029 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de Yes, please. The default signing just leads to error messages… and we nowadays upload source-only anyway, so no builds should be signed by default, only those explicitly created to publish. -- Package-specific i

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 05.01.2014, 15:09 +0100 schrieb Guillem Jover: > On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 17:22:33 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > You raise some very valid points and §I appreciate your concerns and > > perhaps should rephrase my request so that I'm suggesting subsuming the > > most common used fe

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-05 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 17:22:33 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > You raise some very valid points and §I appreciate your concerns and > perhaps should rephrase my request so that I'm suggesting subsuming the > most common used features of debsign and perhaps as part of a staged > migration (compat s

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Sunday 05 January 2014 11:58:07 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le samedi, 4 janvier 2014, 19.54:05 Stefano Rivera a écrit : > > Hi Jonathan (2014.01.02_19:22:33_+0200) > > > > > > * having to support remote signing > > > > > > It would be fair enough to stderr "not supported, please use the >

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-05 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le samedi, 4 janvier 2014, 19.54:05 Stefano Rivera a écrit : > Hi Jonathan (2014.01.02_19:22:33_+0200) > > > > * having to support remote signing > > > > It would be fair enough to stderr "not supported, please use the > > older tool in devscripts" and error 1 if such an argument was > > provide

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jonathan (2014.01.02_19:22:33_+0200) > > * having to support remote signing > > It would be fair enough to stderr "not supported, please use the older > tool in devscripts" and error 1 if such an argument was provided. That > would be pragmatic if (as I suspect) -r is rarely used. Aww. I'm a

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Roger Leigh writes ("Re: Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)"): > On the sbuild/buildd side, we have run dpkg-buildpackage with > "-us -uc" by default for years. If you do enable signing, as is > the case for b

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
You raise some very valid points and §I appreciate your concerns and perhaps should rephrase my request so that I'm suggesting subsuming the most common used features of debsign and perhaps as part of a staged migration (compat symlink to debsign binary name in the phase 1, real name dpkg-sign or w

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-02 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I guess it's probably a good idea to switch the default, becuse I > assume most maintainers do more test builds than final ones. Or users > who either don't have gpg installed or don't have a gpg key. Although > with the current no-si

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 09:24:55 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > * signing would get rafactored into a new program so that users do > >not need to manually mangle the .changes file, rebuild or require > >devscripts for

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > * signing would get rafactored into a new program so that users do >not need to manually mangle the .changes file, rebuild or require >devscripts for something that was possible out-of-the-box. I chose to read that as "debsi

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2013-12-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Guillem Jover , 2013-12-30, 12:27: > >I guess it's probably a good idea to switch the default, becuse I > >assume most maintainers do more test builds than final ones. > > ACK And also, it should be friendly to non-maintainers who are just trying to rebu

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2013-12-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Guillem Jover , 2013-12-30, 12:27: I guess it's probably a good idea to switch the default, becuse I assume most maintainers do more test builds than final ones. ACK If most people agree this would be an improvement, and not just an annoyance, I'm happy to do the change. But there's few thi

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2013-12-30 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! [ CCing debian-devel to get input from possibly afftected users. ] On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:14:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage > X-Debbugs-CC: Arno Töll > > Please disable signing by default. Generally the right thing to

Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2013-12-23 Thread Paul Wise
Package: dpkg-dev Severity: wishlist File: /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage X-Debbugs-CC: Arno Töll Please disable signing by default. Generally the right thing to do for most dpkg-dev users is to have dpkg-buildpackage *not* auto-sign anything. Almost all dpkg-dev users (except buildds) should test an