Control: reassign -1 debian-policy 3.9.8.0
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 06:15:42 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> In any case, I discussed this in a private mail interchange with Ian
> a couple of years ago (AFAIR). My reply back then was that I don't
> personally feel very strongly about the feature, that
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-policy 3.9.8.0
Bug #850156 [dpkg-dev, debian-policy] Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific
series files
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg-dev, debian-policy' to 'debian-policy'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #850156 to the
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 09:15:25 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > FAOD I feel very strongly about this. The bug is over a year old.
> > Can the Policy Editors please tell me when it would be apprropiate to
> > escalate this to the TC ?
*Sigh*
> Sorry, I
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:11:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There isn't even a guarantee that what gets synced to Ubuntu has ever
> been unpacked - or *can* be unpacked - with dpkg-source.
Indeed. Not only is there no guarantee, but it goes wrong in practice
too.
As an operator of
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 21:11:11 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The examples given are for series.ubuntu, which is certainly the case I've
> seen in the wild. Ubuntu, as a project, did not ask for this. As an Ubuntu
> developer, it has never benefitted me. I have only ever seen it used by
>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> > FAOD I feel very strongly about this. The bug is over a year old.
> > Can the Policy Editors please tell me when it would be apprropiate to
> > escalate this to the TC ?
>
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FAOD I feel very strongly about this. The bug is over a year old.
> Can the Policy Editors please tell me when it would be apprropiate to
> escalate this to the TC ?
Sorry, I wrote my other e-mail before reading this.
ISTM that we can move
Simon McVittie writes ("Bug#850156: Please firmly deprecate vendor-specific
series files"):
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 14:36:14 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:41:53 + Ian Jackson
> > wrote:
> > > But [vendor.series] is quite wrong, because
8 matches
Mail list logo