Hi!
On 2019-01-29 09:56, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Given its arch-dependent behavior this might need more exposure than a
> simple rebuild on say amd64. Enabling this at the beginning of a
> release cycle might seem more appropriate.
Lucas performed a full archive rebuild on arm64 with -fstack-clash
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:57:41 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?=
wrote:
> Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so
> > my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still apply,
> > even
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:57:41 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so
> > my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still apply,
> > even though Ubun
Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so
> my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still apply,
> even though Ubuntu has enabled this, but they have a different set of
> architectures.
I wo
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:00:09 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.19.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: security
> > It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> > -fstack-clash
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.19.2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: security
>
> Hello GCC Maintainers!
>
> It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> -fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #918914 [dpkg-dev] add -fstack-clash-protection to default buildflags
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
918914: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918914
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 16:20:23 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Harlan Lieberman-Berg:
> > It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> > -fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture. This
> > would have provided protection against the rec
* Harlan Lieberman-Berg:
> Hello GCC Maintainers!
>
> It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> -fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture. This
> would have provided protection against the recent System Down
> vulnerability (CVE-2018-16864, CVE-2018-16865, CVE-201
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.19.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security
Hello GCC Maintainers!
It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
-fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture. This
would have provided protection against the recent System Down
vulnerability (CVE-201
10 matches
Mail list logo