Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:35:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#97320:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
I noticed I only had logs since July, and didn't make the effort to
discover whether it was due to a log rotation policy or the log file
only being recently introduced. Clearly it's the latter. Thanks for
pointing it out.
My main use case was to be able to tell which packages were upgraded or
in
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:01 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 22:41 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 12:49 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote:
> >
> > > Would it not be more efficient if this information were stored
> > > in /var/lib/dpkg/status?
> > >
> >
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 22:41 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 12:49 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote:
>
> > Would it not be more efficient if this information were stored
> > in /var/lib/dpkg/status?
> >
> > I would find this feature very useful.
> >
> Out of interest, what wo
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 12:49 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote:
> Would it not be more efficient if this information were stored
> in /var/lib/dpkg/status?
>
> I would find this feature very useful.
>
Out of interest, what would you find it useful _for_ ?
I can't think of a use-case for this field tha
Would it not be more efficient if this information were stored
in /var/lib/dpkg/status?
I would find this feature very useful.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
