On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:18:20PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 15:50, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Where is the counter part of "multilevel config" ?
> I'm not sure what you mean here,
I got an answer in the previous E-mail in this thread.
> KDE always uses mu
> > it would only be possible to use debconf values in violation of 10.7.4
> > if the package is in violation by using debconf values to improperly
> > edit "conffiles", as 10.7.4 has nothing to do with debconf values.
> >
> > if the package properly uses debconf values (only on "configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 23:11, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>On 20-06-2005 16:03, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:41:35PM +0200, Jon
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:05:49AM -0600, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> i'm wondering if it would be possible to give me svn access to
> debian-edu on alioth so as not post patches to the list and whatnot-
> i've found the occasional typo and other minor issues in the past, but
> didn't bother to subm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 09:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:39:29PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>>[Jonas Smedegaard]
>>
>>>And you are sure the packages owning those configfiles (and maybe even
>>>conffiles) you replace with symlin
http://bugs.skolelinux.no/show_bug.cgi?id=949
Summary: KDM should not allow shutdown from the thin clients
Product: Skolelinux
Version: sarge-pr03
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20-06-2005 16:03, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:41:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >>The problem raised here is that debian-edu packages messes with sla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 18:20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> it would only be possible to use debconf values in violation of 10.7.4
> if the package is in violation by using debconf values to improperly
> edit "conffiles", as 10.7.4 has nothing to do with debconf
On Δευτέρα 20 Ιούνιος 2005 21:02, Jim Oksvold wrote:
> > So, I suggested that we split the Debian-Edu/Skolelinux ISO in
> > one per language, after all, since the installations will become
> > nation-specific after one point, it will make sense to only
> > include the stuff we need there. So we mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 16:03, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:41:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>The problem raised here is that debian-edu packages messes with slapd
>>conf(ig)files. That cannot (in the Debian we have today, Andre
[Marco Carvalho]
> I don't know if this is right place, but I want to know why
> xdebconfigurator is not used in Debian instalation.
I suspect debian-boot@ would be a better list to ask. I tried to
convice the rest of the installer team to include it in the default
installation, but failed.
--
> So, I suggested that we split the Debian-Edu/Skolelinux ISO in one per
> language, after all, since the installations will become
> nation-specific after one point, it will make sense to only include
> the stuff we need there. So we might have a skolelinux-en.iso,
> skolelinux-no.iso, skoleli
while trying to figure out how debian-edu does it's magic with KDEDIRS,
i think i found a bug in svn (3898) on alioth, a patch is attached.
i'm wondering if it would be possible to give me svn access to
debian-edu on alioth so as not post patches to the list and whatnot-
i've found the occasional
> Non-interactive upgrade is new to Debian. It sure is benificial for the
> users, but it is new, and not yet working.
> The separation of "local admin" and "packaging scripts" is old, and well
> defined (oh, apart from surprises and disagreements about clarifications
> done as part of the Sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 12:44, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:13:11AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>>I think we come closer to the core of the problem when looking at
>>the *packaging system* as the problem. In it's present form it is
>>no
I don't know if this is right place, but I want to know why
xdebconfigurator is not used in Debian instalation.
Sorry for my bad english
Thanks
--
Marco Carvalho | marcoacarvalho(a)gmail.com
http://arrakis.no-ip.info
Maceio - Alagoas - Brazil
Debian GNU/Linux (Sid) | Kernel 2.6.9-i686
GNU-PG ID:0
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 10:07 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> The problem is not yes or no, but *how* should the package be fixed.
> IMHO it is an RC bug if there is no clean upgrade path.
in aspell we have
aspell-de - German dictionary for aspell
aspell-de-alt - German dictionary for aspell (old spell
On Monday 20 June 2005 15:50, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:29:36PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
> wrote:
>
> I found
> debian-edu-config/share/debian-edu/networked-kde2/share/config/kmailrc
> in the version control system,
> but I didn't find the part that uses it.
> >
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:41:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The problem raised here is that debian-edu packages messes with slapd
> conf(ig)files. That cannot (in the Debian we have today, Andreas!) be
> solved by debian-edu using ucf: Debian-edu is not allowed to mess with
> configfiles of
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:29:36PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> - debian-edu-config package
> - we add a dir to the KDEDIRS variable (which contains the ordered
> searchpath for multilevel configuration of KDE)
> in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/20debian-edu-kdedirs script
> - description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 09:57, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>On 19-06-2005 22:44, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I expect upgrades to keep my configuration, and not present me with an
>>>i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-06-2005 10:13, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>I believe the local admin (or the CDD tool behaving as if it was the
>>local adming - in violation of Debian Policy 10.7.4) can't blam
On Monday 20 June 2005 13:40, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:43:57AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
> > On Monday 20 June 2005 09:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
>
>
> > > How will it fit in the debian-edu-configuration?
> >
> > we already use it for our custom kde-conf
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:43:57AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 09:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > How will it fit in the debian-edu-configuration?
> we already use it for our custom kde-config (such as it is)
>
> the main advantage being that we don't have to
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What I have in mind is a program that helps administrators
> to configure their custom Debian distribution.
>
> At user side it is like apt-get, hence the name ccd-adm.
>
>
> cdd-adm setup
>
>This sets up parameters for
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:13:11AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I believe the local admin (or the CDD tool behaving as if it was the
> > local adming - in violation of Debian Policy 10.7.4) can't blame the
> > packaging syste
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
apparent if more languages are to be supported eventually (well, we
ARE after world domination right? :-)
Yes. :)
the stuff we need there. So we might have a skolelinux-en.iso,
skolelinux-no.iso, skolelinux-el.iso, etc.
I'm not sure whether
Hi all,
A few days ago I just did our first Debian-Edu/Skolelinux
installation in Greece, here in Nafplion!! At last after lots of
beaurocracy we got the green light to do it! hooray!!
Everything worked out smoothly using finnarne's pr3 sarge-based CD and
we had only little problems (eg. wit
On Monday 20 June 2005 09:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What is "multilevel configuration"?
>
exactly what it says, having multiple configuration levels for example:
- one with the distro default
- one with the CDD changes to the distro default
- one with the administrator changes
- one with user c
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I believe the local admin (or the CDD tool behaving as if it was the
> local adming - in violation of Debian Policy 10.7.4) can't blame the
> packaging system if changing conffiles into something else than files.
I think we come c
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
Or just because some conservative maintainers fail to understand that
new orthography is meant to be compulsary, soon? ;)
s/understand/accept/
I failed to understand unreasonable things all my live and have a really
hard time to at least to accept
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 19-06-2005 22:44, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > I expect upgrades to keep my configuration, and not present me with an
> > impossible question, where neither of the two options presented are
> > any good to me.
> >
> > This
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 07:42 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Because new German orthography just sucks - not the package, the
> writing rules and it sucks so hard that even the package transition
> fails. ;-)
Or just because some conservative maintainers fail to understand that
new orthography is mean
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:39:29PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jonas Smedegaard]
> > And you are sure the packages owning those configfiles (and maybe even
> > conffiles) you replace with symlinks properly handle their files being
> > replaced with symlinks?
>
> Your question only focus o
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:54:06PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Geert Stappers]
>
> > What I would like to see is a construction that uses .in files, same
> > idea as autoconf does. Have a look at this unified diff:
>
> Something like this would be nice, to make it more flexible. It is
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
