Hi Jörg,
On Montag, 2. April 2012, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Erm, right now backports is still an own host with an own dak install.
> Yes we run that, yes it has the most recent dak install, no it is not on
> ftp-master.debian.org directly. Yet. Plans to change that are there,
> work on code started
On 12803 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On a somewhat related note: dak as it is installed on a.skolelinux.no cannot
> deal with dpkg source format 3.0 packages (ie gosa), and I'm basically the
> only maintainer of this setup, so I've been thinking of asking the Debian ftp
> masters to run
[Steven Chamberlain]
> I'm surprised you didn't already consider this!
>
> http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_e_book_kiosk_for_the_public_libraries_.html
Glad to see my blog have readers. :)
But I would set up such kiosk solution using nodm and a stripped down
desktop with a single appl
On 01/04/12 21:06, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Nope. Why do you ask? ...
I'm surprised you didn't already consider this!
http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_e_book_kiosk_for_the_public_libraries_.html
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On 01/04/12 21:06, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Alessandro Fama]
>> There is a guest session in skolelinux? like ubuntu does, no password
>> and delete everything after logout.
>
> Nope. Why do you ask? Our impression is that schools want to control
> who uses their computer equipment, and such
[Alessandro Fama]
> There is a guest session in skolelinux? like ubuntu does, no password
> and delete everything after logout.
Nope. Why do you ask? Our impression is that schools want to control
who uses their computer equipment, and such guest account would break
their expectations.
--
Happy
[Holger Levsen]
> I wonder if it would be sensible to keep the old build process svn
> based for squeeze and move wheezy builds to git on
> cdimage.debian.org. (I have an account there and this (eg acccounts)
> has been offered to us since a long time. That machine is quite very
> powerful and has
[David Prévot]
> Unless real blockers can be pointed, and not addressed, I guess we
> should consider giving those who are willing to prepare the
> Subversion to Git conversion a green light and get prepared to use
> those amazing tools (did I already mentioned I'd see that as an
> improvement? ;-)
Hi David,
On So 01 Apr 2012 17:19:26 CEST David Prévot wrote:
Unless real blockers can be pointed, and not addressed, I guess we
should consider giving those who are willing to prepare the Subversion
to Git conversion a green light and get prepared to use those amazing
tools (did I already ment
Hi David,
thanks for bringing this up!
Hi ftpmasters, the last paragraph is for you ;)
On Sonntag, 1. April 2012, David Prévot wrote:
> First of all, are there known issues about the Git workflow that would
> justify to stick with Subversion?
the cd/dvd build process uses svn quite a lot.
I w
Hi,
I usually see some comments on IRC, or inside some unrelated threads,
about the willingness to switch the Debian Edu repository from
Subversion to Git, and I propose to start a new thread about that.
First of all, are there known issues about the Git workflow that would
justify to stick with
11 matches
Mail list logo
